[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-3440) ODF 1.2 CD05 Part 1Needs anyIRI datatype
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=22754#action_22754 ]
Michael Brauer commented on OFFICE-3440:
----------------------------------------
Dennis: I of course don't know yet whether I will agree to you updated proposal, but there two things I would like to ask you to consider:
1. We should stay with the name "anyURI". Changing the name causes many changes in the schema, which we would then revert if we switch to XSD 1.1. The name change may also cause confusion.
2. anyURI is a build-in XSD datatype. We may add additional requirements or amend its description, but we certainly cannot provide a different data type definition on the schema level. Unless we switch to a string, where I hope we both agree that this is not really an option.
Regarding my comment: "I think this is a minor issue, and not worth risking future incompatibilities or issues that a non-standard URI/IRI definition has." This should read.
I think this is a minor issue, and not worth risking future incompatibilities or issues that a non-standard URI/IRI *datatype* definition has. So of course RFC3987 is a standard. But the XML datatype that is used in the XML world is the XSD datatype "anyURI". RFC3987 does not define an XML datatype.
> ODF 1.2 CD05 Part 1 Needs anyIRI datatype
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFFICE-3440
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3440
> Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Needs Discussion, Part 1 (Schema), Schema and Datatypes
> Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 CD 05
> Reporter: Dennis Hamilton
> Fix For: ODF 1.2 CD 06
>
>
> The rules for IRI references are slightly different than the rules for anyURI. In particular, anyURI accepts ASCII characters that are excluded from IRI references by [RFC3987].
> Rather than qualify the use of anyURI to be specific to IRIs every place that anyURI is used in the current schema, it is recommended that this be handled in one place by introducing an anyIRI datatype that is derivative of anyURI with an additional pattern constraint that eliminates the ASCII-corresponding characters that are excluded from IRI references in [RFC3987].
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]