Typos and details inOpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-part1-editor-revision_04.odt

[Eike Rathke <eike.rathke@oracle.com>]

Hi Patrick, *,

I found the following typos/details in
OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-part1-editor-revision_04.odt


* 9.1.10 <table:table-column-group>
  
  The second paragraph is deleted and replaced by an insertion of the
  backspace character instead, that might should had been the Enter key
  hit ;-)


* 9.2.5 Cell Range Address List

  Apparently all mentions of Unicode characters are changed to the form
  "c" (U+0099, NAME), that is missing for
  “'” (APOSTROPHE, U+0027)
  which should be
  “'” (U+0027, APOSTROPHE)
  instead.


* 9.4.11 <table:named-expressions>

  Was changed to "element contains a assignments of names to
  expressions", one superfluous "a", should be "contains assignments"
  instead.


* 9.8 <table:dde-links>

  Insertion of "formulas" replaces deletion of "documen", note that the
  trailing "t" was not deleted, so the new word is "formulast".


* 19.347 number:denominator-value

  "to define the display a floating point number" lacks an "of", "to
  define the display of a floating point number".


* 19.358 number:rfc-language-tag

  The replacing paragraph says "Producers may add support for consumers
  that don't support the number:rfc-language-tag attribute by specifying
  number:language, number:script and number:country attributes with
  values that are implementation-dependent."
  
  That is quite contradictionary to the original and now deleted
  intention "If a fall-back is provided for consumers that do not
  support the number:rfc-language-tag attribute, producers should add
  number:language, number:script and number:country attributes whose
  values are as close as possible to the actual value of the
  number:rfc-language-tag attribute. The values of these attributes
  shall not contradict to the value of the number:rfc-language-tag
  attribute."

  Suggested correction:

  "Producers may add support for consumers that don't support the
  number:rfc-language-tag attribute by specifying number:language,
  number:script and number:country attributes with values as close as
  possible to the actual value of the number:rfc-language-tag
  attribute. Producers shall not use values for these attributes that
  contradict the value of the table:rfc-language-tag attribute."


* 19.514 style:rfc-language-tag

  The same as for 19.358 number:rfc-language-tag


* 19.705 table:rfc-language-tag

  The same as for 19.358 number:rfc-language-tag

  The paragraph that is deleted in the other *:rfc-language-tag
  attribute descriptions is kept intact here. Oversight?


* 20.333 style:rfc-language-tag

  The same as for 19.358 number:rfc-language-tag


* 20.334 style:rfc-language-tag-asian

  The same as for 19.358 number:rfc-language-tag


* 20.335 style:rfc-language-tag-complex

  The same as for 19.358 number:rfc-language-tag


* 19.598 table:condition

  "is-true-formula(expression): true if evaluation of the expression
  yields a value that converts to logical type value true in the
  semantics for the expression; false otherwise."
  is added to both, "The defined conditions are:" and "The defined value
  conditions are:"

  Having is-true-formula(expression) listed under both, defined
  conditions and defined value conditions, does not make sense. There is
  no difference. I propose to remove it from the defined value
  conditions and list it only under defined conditions. See
  http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3493
  which I set to "edits rejected".


  Eike

-- 
 Oracle Open Office Calc core developer and i18n transpositionizer.
 Signature key 0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304  7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412
 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Oracle: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
 --
 Please note that my @sun.com accounts are phasing out, use the
 eike.rathke@oracle.com address instead. Thanks.

PGP signature