Re: Typos and details inOpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-part1-editor-revision_04.odt

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

Eike,

Thanks!

Depending on what is agreed to tomorrow, I will probably do another drop
on Weds. of this week. With all these corrections present!

Hope you are at the start of a great week!

Patrick

On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 17:55 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Patrick, *,
> 
> I found the following typos/details in
> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-part1-editor-revision_04.odt
> 
> 
> * 9.1.10 <table:table-column-group>
>   
>   The second paragraph is deleted and replaced by an insertion of the
>   backspace character instead, that might should had been the Enter key
>   hit ;-)
> 
> 
> * 9.2.5 Cell Range Address List
> 
>   Apparently all mentions of Unicode characters are changed to the form
>   "c" (U+0099, NAME), that is missing for
>   “'” (APOSTROPHE, U+0027)
>   which should be
>   “'” (U+0027, APOSTROPHE)
>   instead.
> 
> 
> * 9.4.11 <table:named-expressions>
> 
>   Was changed to "element contains a assignments of names to
>   expressions", one superfluous "a", should be "contains assignments"
>   instead.
> 
> 
> * 9.8 <table:dde-links>
> 
>   Insertion of "formulas" replaces deletion of "documen", note that the
>   trailing "t" was not deleted, so the new word is "formulast".
> 
> 
> * 19.347 number:denominator-value
> 
>   "to define the display a floating point number" lacks an "of", "to
>   define the display of a floating point number".
> 
> 
> * 19.358 number:rfc-language-tag
> 
>   The replacing paragraph says "Producers may add support for consumers
>   that don't support the number:rfc-language-tag attribute by specifying
>   number:language, number:script and number:country attributes with
>   values that are implementation-dependent."
>   
>   That is quite contradictionary to the original and now deleted
>   intention "If a fall-back is provided for consumers that do not
>   support the number:rfc-language-tag attribute, producers should add
>   number:language, number:script and number:country attributes whose
>   values are as close as possible to the actual value of the
>   number:rfc-language-tag attribute. The values of these attributes
>   shall not contradict to the value of the number:rfc-language-tag
>   attribute."
> 
>   Suggested correction:
> 
>   "Producers may add support for consumers that don't support the
>   number:rfc-language-tag attribute by specifying number:language,
>   number:script and number:country attributes with values as close as
>   possible to the actual value of the number:rfc-language-tag
>   attribute. Producers shall not use values for these attributes that
>   contradict the value of the table:rfc-language-tag attribute."
> 
> 
> * 19.514 style:rfc-language-tag
> 
>   The same as for 19.358 number:rfc-language-tag
> 
> 
> * 19.705 table:rfc-language-tag
> 
>   The same as for 19.358 number:rfc-language-tag
> 
>   The paragraph that is deleted in the other *:rfc-language-tag
>   attribute descriptions is kept intact here. Oversight?
> 
> 
> * 20.333 style:rfc-language-tag
> 
>   The same as for 19.358 number:rfc-language-tag
> 
> 
> * 20.334 style:rfc-language-tag-asian
> 
>   The same as for 19.358 number:rfc-language-tag
> 
> 
> * 20.335 style:rfc-language-tag-complex
> 
>   The same as for 19.358 number:rfc-language-tag
> 
> 
> * 19.598 table:condition
> 
>   "is-true-formula(expression): true if evaluation of the expression
>   yields a value that converts to logical type value true in the
>   semantics for the expression; false otherwise."
>   is added to both, "The defined conditions are:" and "The defined value
>   conditions are:"
> 
>   Having is-true-formula(expression) listed under both, defined
>   conditions and defined value conditions, does not make sense. There is
>   no difference. I propose to remove it from the defined value
>   conditions and list it only under defined conditions. See
>   http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3493
>   which I set to "edits rejected".
> 
> 
>   Eike
>