[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Issue Comment Edited: (OFFICE-1809) ISO/IECJTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-17
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=23246#action_23246 ]
Dennis Hamilton edited comment on OFFICE-1809 at 11/11/10 8:56 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Errata 02 - ODF 1.2 Reconciliation.
For <table:detective> ODF 1.2 has some useful improvements but still references UI behavior. Reconciliation of that aspect is called for.
For <table:operation> the ODF 1.2 definition can be harmonized with Errata 02 in an useful way.
The <table:highlighted-range> element was also questioned in the original defect report, but that was neglected in Errata 02. Seeing them togetther in ODF 1.2 makes it clear that the relationship needs to be drawn a little more closely, perhaps related to the Errata 02 handling of table:name as well.
Finally, Errata 02 and ODF 1.2 are already reconciled in the definition of the values of the <table:operation> table:name attribute.
was (Author: orcmid):
Errata 02 - ODF 1.2 Reconciliation.
For <table:detective> ODF 1.2 has some useful improvements but still references UI behavior. Reconciliation of that aspect is called for.
For <table:operation> the ODF 1.2 definition can be harmonized with Errata 02 in an useful way.
The <table:highlighted-range> element was also questioned in the original defect report, but that was neglected in Errata 02. Seeing them togetther in ODF 1.2 makes it clear that the relationship needs to be drawn a little more closely, perhaps related to the Errata 02 handling of table:name as well.
> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-17
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFFICE-1809
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1809
> Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 (second edition), ODF 1.0 Errata 02
> Reporter: Robert Weir
> Assignee: Svante Schubert
> Fix For: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5
>
>
> Transcribed from http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1078.htm
> Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-17
> QUALIFIER clarification required
> REFERENCES IN DOCUMENT Clauses 8.4.3 thru 8.4.5
> NATURE OF DEFECT In our opinion, subclauses 8.4.3 thru 8.4.5 are underspecified and incomprehensible. They do not provide enough background information or examples. Moreover, the semantics of trace-dependents, remove-dependents, trace-precedents, remove-precedents, trace-errors. trace-dependents and remove-dependents are not specified at all.
> SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE SUBMITTER
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]