OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [office] 15-day Committee Specification Draft Review - Dealing withDecember Holidays

Hi Dennis,

If there is an interested European reviewer, you should just point them to 
CSD06 and let them get to work.  If they are really interested in avoiding 
the holiday crunch then there is no need to wait for the official OASIS 
announcement to begin reviewing the text.  Have them start reading now, 
and then simply submit the comments once the review official starts.

Also, this TC has always been accommodating to public comments that comes 
in a day or two late.  I don't see any reason why we would not continue in 
that way.


"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote on 12/07/2010 
03:34:39 PM:

> RE: [office] 15-day Committee Specification Draft Review - Dealing 
> with December Holidays
> I was asked by a potential European reviewer of CD06 whether the 
> Public Review would extend into the traditional year-end Holiday 
> period.  I had no answer.
> I do notice that were CD06 available on the site and the Public 
> Review started tomorrow, December 8, it would conclude on December 
> 23.  Later would of course intrude deeper into the holiday period.
> I don't know how the year-end holiday period is dealt with for 
> review and ballot periods, but it occured to me that rather than 
> delay a short review into 2011 in order to not collide with the 
> holidays, it might work better to extend the duration of the review 
> if it starts after December 8 (or even then). 
> Would that perhaps be a good idea for the CD06 Public Review, 
> especially if there is any overlap with the last 10 days of December?
>  - Dennis
> PS: On the TAG TC, our second Public Review was for 30 days just 
> because we had made enough changes to the documents that we though 
> having a longer review would be helpful.  There were no holiday 
> issues in that case.  (We received no comments though.)
> Dennis E. Hamilton
> ------------------
> NuovoDoc: Design for Document System Interoperability 
> mailto:Dennis.Hamilton@acm.org | gsm:+1-206.779.9430 
> http://NuovoDoc.com http://ODMA.info/dev/ http://nfoWorks.org 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] 
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 04:59
> To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [office] 15-day Committee Specification Draft Review 
> Request for Open Document Format for Office Applications 
> (OpenDocument) Version 1.2
> The following request has been submitted to the OASIS TC 
> Administrator on 06/12/2010:
> Submitter's Name 
>      Michael Brauer 
> TC Name 
>      OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) 
> TC Email Address 
>      office@lists.oasis-open.org 
> Work Product Title 
>      Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) 
> Version 1.2 
> Committee Specification Draft ## 
>      06 
> Additional Resources 
>      http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/40487/
> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-rev02-diffs.zip 
> Approval Link 
> Previous Public Review Announcement 
> [ ... ]
> Thank you for your request. We will confirm receipt and schedule the
> public review shortly. You can follow the progress at: 
> http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TCADMIN

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]