[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Re: Towards a more modular ODF?
Charles, On 7/28/2011 4:17 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > Hello Rob, > <snip> >> This is the question of having a time-boxed schedule or a feature-boxed >> schedule. But we don't need to be so rigid about this either way. For >> example, we can have time-boxed CSD's (every 6 months) while having the >> final CSD (the eventual CS) be feature-boxed. > > I know this sounds expensive but how about "testing" this modular approach with the 1.3/1.4? We can always reassess this method in due time and revert back to the former one if necessary. I'm in favor of experimenting responsibly, so let's go ahead with a modular approach. :-) > What I am missing is what "module" is ready for work or progression as Rob describes? That is rather than discuss potential modules, let's have someone propose work that might make a good module to proceed at a different pace and see what happens. If other parts of the standard aren't progressing as rapidly, perhaps that work should move out on its own. I suppose I am looking for something more concrete than modularization as an idea. May be a very good idea but so far I haven't seen any dragging or rapidly proceeding parts for ODF 1.3/ODF-Next. Hope you are having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net Homepage: http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]