[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Acceptance of new Change-Tracking Proposal
Am 23.09.2011 01:02, schrieb robert_weir@us.ibm.com: > <office@lists.oasis-open.org> wrote on 09/22/2011 04:41:35 PM: > > <snip> > >> I am currently working on a formal proposal, extending the >> explanation earlier given on the SC list [1, 2, 3, 4]. >> > We've had a SC looking at change tracking proposals for many months now, > and they've made some good progress in developing their proposals. They > are planning on sending a Draft Committee Note for public review next > month. Integrating another proposal would delay that report. Not the end > of the world, but that would be the impact. > Just for clarification, only the draft might be blocked - although there is already plenty information about CCT available to start integrating as third proposal to the note - not blocked is the ability of the SC to continue its work. For instance, the SC could define the minimum set of change operations that an ODF application offering change-tracking should implement. This set is not defined yet and would be required by all proposals. This set is also known as our first CT milestone. No reason for stagnation. - Svante
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]