Subject: Re: [office] Another 10 issues for 7 November 2011
Thorsten, Apologies, I have been "off" email for a while, a couple of questions: On 11/01/2011 06:02 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Patrick, some quick comments inline -
4. Please standardize "Line Start Prohibition Rule" http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3356Agreed that this is missing, but there's no concrete proposal from Murata-San -> ask for that& defer.
Are you going to follow up with Murata-san?
9. Comments on Digital Signatures in ODF 1.2 Part 3 http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3030No material change to objections -> defer.
When you say defer (I am sure this will come up again with you, me or others in the future) do we mean to really "defer" or are we going to close?
The reason I ask is that I would prefer to not have a grab bag of requests and possible features that form a "deferred" group. If we really mean to work on them at some point, next release cycle, ok, but let's either resolve them, or set a firm date for resolution, even if that is next release.
Does that sound reasonable? Hope you are having a great week! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau email@example.com Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net Homepage: http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau