[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Evolving ODF, Interop and Multiple Implementations
Rob Weir wrote: > I'd like to suggest that we do this based on the existence of *multiple > implementations* of the new capability, or at least of committed plans of > multiple implementers to implement the new capability. > Hi Rob, I would presume some level of endorsement by multiple implementers is already implied when new features get voted in to ODF. I'm unconvinced we should add more ceremony at this point, possibly leading to an even slower evolvement of ODF? > In other words, I'd like to discourage adding capabilities to ODF 1.3 > unless it promotes interoperability. > There is a certain circularity in this argument. If a majority of the TC deems an addition or change to ODF useful, we should get it in. Best regards, -- Thorsten Behrens SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg; GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Attachment:
pgpcNEcEJZorU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]