Re: [office] Outstanding issues

[robert_weir@us.ibm.com]

<office@lists.oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/14/2013
07:26:30 AM:

> From: Svante Schubert <svante.schubert@gmail.com>
> To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
> Date: 10/14/2013 07:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [office] Outstanding issues
> Sent by: <office@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> JIRA already offers some semantic groupings via components 
> https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE?
> report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:components-panel
> 
> and some roadmap view, where issues are sorted by ODF version:
> https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?
> id=10027&subset=-1
> 
> ^^some base to start.
> 
> I would be curious on the amount/work-load of errata an OASIS TC is
> required to write for ISO.
> If we would have stick with a train wagon model for specification,
> like a time boxed deliver of versions, would it create errata work-
> load for each wagon?
> 


The general process for the ISO interlock with OASIS
is this:

1) National Bodies submit a defect report in JTC1/SC34/WG6.
 

2) This is reviewed by the Project Editor (Patrick)
who would consult with the TC to develop a response.  A response would
indicate our plan for each reporter defect:  fix in errata, defer
to next revision of the standard, do nothing, etc.

3) WG6 would then meeting to discuss the defect report
and response and come to an agreement on what to do.

4) If changes are required then we do them in parallel
with OASIS Errata and ISO Corrigenda.

So the workload depends on the volume of defect reports
we receive.  ISO maintains only the most-recent version of a standard,
so you don't need to worry for "errata for each wagon".  

Regards,

-Rob

> In the end we have to keep in mind, that the specification is driven
> by the implementors. Otherwise we will share the fate as XHTML.
> 
> Till soon in the call,
> Svante
> 
> Am 12.10.2013 02:13, schrieb Patrick Durusau:
> Greetings!
> 
> In order to start moving effectively towards ODF 1.3, we need to:
> 
> 1) Have a discussion about what to include in ODF 1.3, and
> 
> 2) What should be included in ODF 2.0?
> 
> The ODF JIRA instance lists:
> 
> 143 Open issues and,
> 
> 219 New issues.
> 
> I will try to look at those categories more closely over the weekend
> and will post a summary of what possible groupings I see in the issues.
> 
> Your groupings may (will?) differ from mine so please do take a look
> at JIRA when you can.
> 
> Don't want to rush to decisions but we do need to start moving in
the
> direction of deciding on features, due dates, etc.
> 
> Hope everyone is at the start of a great weekend!
> 
> Patrick

> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS
TC that 
> > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in
OASIS at:
> > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> >
>