OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (OFFICE-3931) Problems in 20.226 presentation:display-date-time

Regina Henschel created OFFICE-3931:

             Summary: Problems in 20.226 presentation:display-date-time
                 Key: OFFICE-3931
                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3931
             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Presentation
    Affects Versions: ODF 1.2
            Reporter: Regina Henschel
            Priority: Minor
             Fix For: ODF 1.3

As described in issue 3930, the first sentence needs to be corrected.

But in addition I have noticed this:
In date-time case the wording is
"false: drawing shape from a <style:master-page> element with the presentation class date-time should not be visible."
whereas for footer, header and page-number cases it is
"false: drawing shape used as a *** of a <style:master-page> element should not be visible.

That is inconsistent.

ODF 1.1 is more explicit about the condition by referring to the presentation:class attribute (now 19.389). In ODF 1.1 you read e.g.
"The presentation:display-date-time attribute sets the visibility of presentation shapes from the master page with the presentation class date-time."

Any reason for mentioning presentation:class in case date-time and not in the other cases?

Should we remove the inconsistency in addition to correcting the broken sentence?

If yes, remove reference to presentation:class from date-time case, or add reference to presentation:class for the other cases?

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]