[OASIS Issue Tracker] (OFFICE-3928) chart position without axis labels

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=69891#comment-69891 ] 

Regina Henschel commented on OFFICE-3928:
-----------------------------------------

{quote}Suggest:

The {{<chart:coordinate-region>}} element specifies a positioning rectangle for charts.
  
{quote}
The term "chart" is not specific enough, it might be understood including labels. The purpose of this sentence is to define the term "positioning rectangle", which is used later in the description. Therefore I have used this construction. But "The {{<chart:coordinate-region>}} element specifies a positioning rectangle." would be OK for me.
----
{quote}Suggest:

The two-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system of chart types chart:area, chart:bar, chart:bubble, chart:gnatt, chart:line, chart:scatter, chart:stock and chart:surface, is contained by the positioning rectangle. Coordinate systems are scaled to lie within that rectangle.
{quote}
The specification allows user-defined chart types. Therefore a finite series of items is not suitable. A coordinate system itself is infinite, therefore I have uses "used intervals on the axes". The sentence "Axis labels, tick marks, axis titles and data labels are not considered in determining the coordinate-region." is essential, because it describes the difference to the behavior without the new element. "lie within" does not contain, that it reaches the edges.

So no, please keep my proposal.
----
{quote}Suggest:

The positioning rectangle for chart types chart:circle, chart:radar, chart:radar-filled, and chart:ring, is defined as the smallest bounding rectangle box of the smallest bounding circle.
{quote}
 

You have commented "To some degree repeats itself." Can you explain that? I think, that all parts of the description are needed.

Your  suggestion has a wrong logic. The positioning rectangle is given by the new element and the specification describes how the content is drawn into this rectangle. Your suggestion determines the position rectangle from the content. The properties "uniformly" and "centered" are missing.

So no, please keep my proposal.
----
{quote}Perhaps "greater zero" was meant to read: "greater than zero?"
{quote}
Yes. Please change it.
{quote}Further the text (to me) seems to confuse *protrusion" from the coordinate region with "expansion" of the coordinate region. Even with a value greater than zero, a data may or may not protrude from the positioning rectangle. Depends on the size of the data point representation within. Conversely, expanding the coordinate space is different from the location of elements.
{quote}
This needs an example. Let continue with https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201805/msg00056.html.

 

 

 

> chart position without axis labels
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-3928
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3928
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Chart
>            Reporter: Regina Henschel
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: ODF 1.3
>
>
> The proposal adds a new element <chart:coordinate-region> as child to the <chart:plot-area> element. It contains the position and size of the coordinate system excluding the axis labels. That makes the diagram independent of length of axis labels, which might change, if linked data changes, and it makes it easier for authors to align several charts.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.7.2#77003)