The ODF TC chat log for 15 Oct. 2018.
Hope everyone is at the start of a great week!
Patrick: agenda approved by consent
Patrick: October 5th: new WDs (of Parts 2, 3 and 4 documentation and schemas) to be issued following initial reconciliation of all resolved issues in JIRA and all changes in the current WDs.
October 19th: new WDs to be issued following reconciliation of documentation changes versus schema changes.
November 16th: new WDs to be issued following proof-reading of entire text for editorial/style consistency.
December 7th: new WDs to be issued following auto-generation of text from schemas and auto-generation of tables of contents and indexes.
Patrick: COSM editing update by Patrick - see the schedule posted in the chat.
Patrick: By November 16th drafts, include any new edits requested by the TC for ODF 1.3.
Patrick: "auto: the connection line may leave in all four directions from a drawing object."
Patrick: That's the text from ODF 1.3 - current draft
Patrick: Do we need a separate issue for ODF 1.3?
Patrick: Separately, what fix do we suggest?
Patrick: Michael suggests it could say "any direction" instead of "leave in all four directions"
Patrick: Also involves Office-3671 - a feature that is not yet in ODF 1.3
Patrick: Patrick - Office-3671 -> Office-3677
Patrick: Regina: for errata - "auto: the connection line may leave in any of the four directions from a drawing object."
Patrick: or "auto: the connection line may leave in any direction from a drawing object."
Patrick: Regina, in ODF 1.2, there are only four directions, left, right, up and down.
Patrick: "auto: the connection line may be up, down, left or right from a drawing object"
Patrick: use "auto: the connection line may be up, down, left or right from a drawing object" for ODF 1.2 errata.
Patrick: use "auto: the connection line may be up, down, left or right from a drawing object" for current drafts of ODF 1.3. - Patrick to create new Jira issue to track for ODF 1.3.
Patrick: so, "atm" ("at") becomes "atm" ?
Patrick: Michael - if we remove the unit, does that make existing documents with "at" invalid?
Patrick: Andreas - do refer to unit names that are implementation specific
Patrick: will create error rather than wrong value - Regina
Patrick: so, remove ("at") for ODF 1.2 errata; Patrick create issue for ODF 1.3 with the same resolution
Technical Advisory Board, OASIS (TAB)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net