[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (OFFICE-4024) Conformance clause 2.2.1 D, D3 - w or w/o namespace the same?
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Durusau updated OFFICE-4024: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: ODF 1.4 > Conformance clause 2.2.1 D, D3 - w or w/o namespace the same? > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFFICE-4024 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4024 > Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: ODF 1.3 > Reporter: Patrick Durusau > Priority: Major > Fix For: ODF 1.4 > > > 2.2.1 D) D.3) reads: > ***** > If a style:condition, table:condition, table:expression, table:formula or text:formula attribute value begins with a namespace prefix bound to namespace > "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2," the syntax and semantics of the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by the prefix shall conform to part 2 of this specification. If a namespace prefix is omitted at the beginning of the attribute value, the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by a prefix shall conform as if there were a prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2". > ***** > It looks to me like with or without an explicit namespace prefix, the namespace is the same? Yes? > If that is the case, why not just say absent a namespace, then ... the namespace? > If a namespace is declared (should?) then we should say that. > It's not clear what is meant. > Â -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.3#803004)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]