[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Next steps questions for ODF 1.3
Paul, 1) The TC has discovered that in the most recent public review, section 5.5.1 General of part 3 read: "The under-specification of change tracking in ODF 1.2 resulted in a number of different choices being possible as to how to implement the feature. While each of these choices would be consistent with the way that the feature is specified, unless identical choices are made, it is likely that the resulting implementations would not be fully interoperable. For this reason, where interoperability of change tracking between implementations is required, implementers are recommended to carry out specific checks that their implementation choices are the same or similar enough to be interoperable." That language was changed in our drafts and should have read: ""The under-specification of change tracking in ODF 1.2 resulted in varying implementations of this feature. Where interoperability between implementations is required, this feature should be checked for interoperability." See: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3873 The TC sees this as an editorial error to be noted to the TC Admin. Will that be a problem? 2) The TC received one comment, https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4094, that does identify an error in the spec, but it is one that has existed since 1.2 and so far as we can tell, no implementer has followed our advice. Quite possibly because what we say makes no sense for time calculations. We intend to respond by acknowledging the error and setting it to ODF 1.4. Will that suffice? 3) Svante wants to know what changes need to be made to prepare the texts for the TC vote to make 03 the Committee Specification (contingent on our supplying the proper forms about comments and changes.) Thanks! Hope you are having a great week! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Technical Advisory Board, OASIS (TAB) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net Homepage: http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]