[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (OFFICE-4024) Conformance clause 2.2.1 D, D3 - w or w/o namespace the same?
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=78177#comment-78177 ] Patrick Durusau commented on OFFICE-4024: ----------------------------------------- Let's see if adding some artifacts makes the choices clearer:  ***** If a style:condition, table:condition, table:expression, table:formula or text:formula attribute value begins with a namespace prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2,"  the syntax and semantics of the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by the prefix shall conform to part 2 of this specification.  [else] If a namespace prefix is omitted at the beginning of the attribute value,  [then] the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by a prefix shall conform as if there were a prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2".  Either way, behavior is defined by "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2" Notice this should refer to part 3. Does that help? I think Regina's question is answered by observing it was really poor expression of a simple idea, if no namespace, then "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2", same behavior if there is: "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2"  > Conformance clause 2.2.1 D, D3 - w or w/o namespace the same? > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFFICE-4024 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4024 > Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: ODF 1.3 > Reporter: Patrick Durusau > Assignee: Patrick Durusau > Priority: Major > Fix For: ODF 1.4 > > > 2.2.1 D) D.3) reads: > ***** > If a style:condition, table:condition, table:expression, table:formula or text:formula attribute value begins with a namespace prefix bound to namespace > "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2," the syntax and semantics of the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by the prefix shall conform to part 2 of this specification. If a namespace prefix is omitted at the beginning of the attribute value, the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by a prefix shall conform as if there were a prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2". > ***** > It looks to me like with or without an explicit namespace prefix, the namespace is the same? Yes? > If that is the case, why not just say absent a namespace, then ... the namespace? > If a namespace is declared (should?) then we should say that. > It's not clear what is meant. >  -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.3#803004)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]