[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Notes from 30 January 2023
Greetings! Notes from the ODF TC teleconference on 30 January 2023 follow below.Stay safe everyone, despite being under-reported, flu and COVID surges are happening.
Patrick *************** *Patrick:* quorom -yes *Patrick:* Agenda - approved by consent *Patrick:* Minutes of 23 of January 2023 - approved by consent *Patrick:* FYI - editors triage - by consent *Regina Henschel:* 4114, 4113 *Patrick:* 4113 - should use the same language is all cases, draft resolution is correct (Francis) *Patrick:* Yes to 5, except for 4113 and 4114. *Patrick:* https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4140 *Svante:* It is mandatory in the RNG in ODF 1.2 and ODF 1.3 *Svante:* Optional in ODF 1.1 *Patrick:* The gray box is auto-generated *Patrick:* Regina says only note 1 is necessary *Patrick:* So, delete notes 2 and 3? *Patrick:* Michael - notes 2 and 3 contain copy/paste errors *Patrick:* Patrick - let's delete all three notes *Patrick:* My new language for the text: The office:version attribute shall be present in every <office:document>, <office:document-content>, <office:document-styles>, <office:document-meta>, and <office:document-settings> element in the XML documents that comprise an OpenDocument 1.4 document. The value of the office:version attribute shall be "1.4". *Patrick:* Regina suggest leaving "When an office:version-requiring element has office:version omitted, the element is based on a version of the OpenDocument specification earlier than v1.2." for note 1. *Patrick:* Francis agrees *Patrick:* Reform note 1, delete notes 2 and 3, use updated language in chat for the proposal - change in the schema as well. *Patrick:* Andreas - if not 1.4, it is invalid - not the correct standard to use *Patrick:* Regina - useful for reader to know there was a prior version where it could be omitted - *Patrick:* The office:version attribute value was not required by OpenDocument specifications prior to 1.2. *Regina Henschel:* When an office:version-requiring element has office:version omitted, the _document_ is based on a version of the OpenDocument specification earlier than v1.2." for note 1. *Patrick:* Use - The office:version attribute value was not required by OpenDocument specifications prior to 1.2. for note 1. *Patrick:* delete 2 and 3 - Note 1 becomes just note because there is just one *Alfred Hellstern:* we have two occurrences of urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.3 *Patrick:* Office-4093 *Patrick:* https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4093 needs to be applied - *Patrick:* Francis - has been applied in github *Patrick:* 7. style:writing-mode *Patrick:* Patrick - are we the place the be giving advice on Unicode? Define our attributes and let others instruct on Unicode. *Patrick:* Windows 97 to Windows XP was the change to Unicode - Regina *Patrick:* Regina - there's a picture in Japanese requirements - is top and bottom - How much specifics of details do we need to have in the specification? about writing systems *Patrick:* Regina has attached a proposal to the JIRA issue - *Patrick:* Adjourned - -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Technical Advisory Board, OASIS (TAB) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net Homepage: http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]