[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06
I think what is being pointed out is that full, changes-accepted versions are reviewed, but that supplemental change-tracked copies are provided for the use of reviewers in addition to the clean, final-form versions. This is how I have seen it happening on other TCs. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 16:24 To: Kim Goolsby Cc: Mary McRae; oic@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06 Hi Kim, I think Mary was asking to accept all of the changes in the HTML version, but only the changes on the cover and footer on the other versions. Or am I misunderstanding her three requests? Making all three documents identical is certainly possible, but then we're not showing change tracking, which we're required to do as well. -Rob Kim Goolsby <kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/07/2010 05:40:10 PM: > > Re: [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF > Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06 > > The files still don't quite match. For the html, all changes were > approved, so we see no markup. However, the odt & pdf files still > show markup in the appendices. We need all three versions to be > identical. Would you mind accepting all changes in the odt file, > then re-generating it & and the pdf files? > > Thanks much! > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:38 PM, <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/07/2010 04:08:24 PM: > > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > Please make the following changes: > > > > 1. Accept change tracking on cover pages/running footers. The result > > is impossible to read. (see html screenshot below) > > > > [attachment "2010-10-07_15.57.49.png" deleted by Robert > Weir/Cambridge/IBM] > > > > OK. > > > > 2. I have no idea where the use of gold came from for noting > > insertions and deletions. It's not part of the style; please revert to > black. > > > > I think this is an app setting, not part of the style. The color of the > change tracking varies by the user, so you can distinguish the changes > from multiple users. Why it picked gold for my color is a mystery. In > any case, I overrode the automatic color assignment in > Tools\Options\Writer\Changes, to make it all black. > > > 3. Since the change marks aren't properly displayed in the html > > version, please approve all changes and then produce the html file. > > > > Done. > > > > > None of these changes should require a new TC vote; please send > > updated files to Kim. > > > > Attached are the revised files. Thanks again! > > -Rob > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Mary > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 7, 2010, at 9:52 AM, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: > > > > > Hi Kim, > > > > > > What you will see with the ODT file will depend on your view mode in > your > > > app. > > > > > > If you are using OpenOffice.org you can go to Edit/Changes/Show and > you > > > should see change tracking. That should reveal Appendix B as well. My > > > > guess is the TOC inconsistency is just a limitation in OO. But it > looks > > > right to me if you enable show change tracking. Of course, after the > > > review, when we "accept" all changes, these issues go away as well. > > > > > > If you need the ODT file to show the changes by default, you can just > > > re-save the document after enabling that setting. Or if you want I > can > > > upload a new version with that enabled. But before I do that, could > you > > > try it on your machine and let me know whether there are any other > changes > > > required, or whether that clears up the other inconsistencies you were > > > > reporting? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kim Goolsby <kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/07/2010 08:19:15 > AM: > > >> > > >> Subject: > > >> > > >> Re: [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF > > >> Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06 > > >> > > >> Hi Rob, > > >> > > >> The odt file does not show the markup, just the html & pdf files do. > > >> I've attached pictures of each file's title page to illustrate what I > > > > mean. > > >> > > >> Also, the odt file shows two appendix A's. The html & pdf files show > > >> Appendix A & B. > > >> > > >> The odt file is different from the html & pdf files in two aspects. > > >> So, it appears that the odt file was not used to generate the pdf & > > >> html files. > > >> > > >> I believe that all the files should look like the attached odt (once > > >> the appendix numbering [lettering] is corrected). Mary will correct > > >> me if I'm wrong but I haven't QC'd other specs at this stage that > > >> show markup. Instead, a diff file was delivered with the spec. > > >> > > >> Please let me know of any other questions and comments. > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Kim > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:14 PM, <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > >> Kim, > > >> > > >> Can you give us some examples of what you mean by "shows markup > rather > > >> than the final view"? Since this is a follow-up 15-day public > review, > > > I > > >> believe that we are required to show the change tracking from the > > > previous > > >> public review. That probably explains everything that you are > seeing. > > >> > > >> > > >> -Rob > > >> > > >> Kim Goolsby <kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/06/2010 04:15:28 > > > > PM: > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF > > >>> Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06 > > >>> > > >>> TCADMIN-245 > > >>> > > >>> Please make the following changes to this document: > > >>> > > >>> 1. Please change the Revision History appendix to Appendix B. > > >>> Appendix B shows in the Table of Contents but the actual header on > > >>> page 17 of the odt file shows Appendix A. > > >>> > > >>> 2. The html file's title page shows garbled information. Please > > >>> regenerate this file, making sure that 'Hidden Paragraphs' & > > >>> 'Nonprinting Characters' are turned off in the 'View' menu. > > >>> > > >>> 3. The pdf file also shows markup rather than the final view. Please > > >>> regenerate this file, making sure that 'Hidden Paragraphs' & > > >>> 'Nonprinting Characters' are turned off in the 'View' menu. > > >>> > > >>> Please let me know of any questions or comments. > > >>> > > >>> Thank you, > > >>> Kim > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Kim Goolsby > > >>> Publications Specialist > > >>> OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society > > >>> email: kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org > > >>> web: www.oasis-open.org > > >>> phone: 1.734.223.6890 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Kim Goolsby > > >> Publications Specialist > > >> OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society > > >> email: kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org > > >> web: www.oasis-open.org > > >> phone: 1.734.223.6890[attachment "state of interop html.png" deleted > > >> by Robert Weir/Cambridge/IBM] [attachment "state of interop pdf.png" > > >> deleted by Robert Weir/Cambridge/IBM] [attachment "state of interop > > >> odt.png" deleted by Robert Weir/Cambridge/IBM] > > > > > > -- > Kim Goolsby > Publications Specialist > OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society > email: kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org > web: www.oasis-open.org > phone: 1.734.223.6890 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]