[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06
Correct. Thanks Rob! Mary On Oct 7, 2010, at 7:23 PM, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: > Hi Kim, > > I think Mary was asking to accept all of the changes in the HTML version, > but only the changes on the cover and footer on the other versions. > > Or am I misunderstanding her three requests? > > Making all three documents identical is certainly possible, but then we're > not showing change tracking, which we're required to do as well. > > -Rob > > Kim Goolsby <kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/07/2010 05:40:10 PM: > >> >> Re: [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF >> Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06 >> >> The files still don't quite match. For the html, all changes were >> approved, so we see no markup. However, the odt & pdf files still >> show markup in the appendices. We need all three versions to be >> identical. Would you mind accepting all changes in the odt file, >> then re-generating it & and the pdf files? >> >> Thanks much! > >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:38 PM, <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/07/2010 04:08:24 PM: >> >>> >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> Please make the following changes: >>> >>> 1. Accept change tracking on cover pages/running footers. The result >>> is impossible to read. (see html screenshot below) >>> >>> [attachment "2010-10-07_15.57.49.png" deleted by Robert >> Weir/Cambridge/IBM] >>> >> >> OK. >> >> >>> 2. I have no idea where the use of gold came from for noting >>> insertions and deletions. It's not part of the style; please revert to >> black. >>> >> >> I think this is an app setting, not part of the style. The color of the >> change tracking varies by the user, so you can distinguish the changes >> from multiple users. Why it picked gold for my color is a mystery. In >> any case, I overrode the automatic color assignment in >> Tools\Options\Writer\Changes, to make it all black. >> >>> 3. Since the change marks aren't properly displayed in the html >>> version, please approve all changes and then produce the html file. >>> >> >> Done. >> >>> >>> None of these changes should require a new TC vote; please send >>> updated files to Kim. >>> >> >> Attached are the revised files. Thanks again! >> >> -Rob >> >> >> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Mary >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 7, 2010, at 9:52 AM, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Kim, >>>> >>>> What you will see with the ODT file will depend on your view mode in >> your >>>> app. >>>> >>>> If you are using OpenOffice.org you can go to Edit/Changes/Show and >> you >>>> should see change tracking. That should reveal Appendix B as well. > My >> >>>> guess is the TOC inconsistency is just a limitation in OO. But it >> looks >>>> right to me if you enable show change tracking. Of course, after > the >>>> review, when we "accept" all changes, these issues go away as well. >>>> >>>> If you need the ODT file to show the changes by default, you can > just >>>> re-save the document after enabling that setting. Or if you want I >> can >>>> upload a new version with that enabled. But before I do that, could >> you >>>> try it on your machine and let me know whether there are any other >> changes >>>> required, or whether that clears up the other inconsistencies you > were >> >>>> reporting? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> -Rob >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Kim Goolsby <kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/07/2010 > 08:19:15 >> AM: >>>>> >>>>> Subject: >>>>> >>>>> Re: [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF >>>>> Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06 >>>>> >>>>> Hi Rob, >>>>> >>>>> The odt file does not show the markup, just the html & pdf files > do. >>>>> I've attached pictures of each file's title page to illustrate what > I >> >>>> mean. >>>>> >>>>> Also, the odt file shows two appendix A's. The html & pdf files > show >>>>> Appendix A & B. >>>>> >>>>> The odt file is different from the html & pdf files in two aspects. >>>>> So, it appears that the odt file was not used to generate the pdf & >>>>> html files. >>>>> >>>>> I believe that all the files should look like the attached odt > (once >>>>> the appendix numbering [lettering] is corrected). Mary will correct >>>>> me if I'm wrong but I haven't QC'd other specs at this stage that >>>>> show markup. Instead, a diff file was delivered with the spec. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know of any other questions and comments. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Kim >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:14 PM, <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>>>> Kim, >>>>> >>>>> Can you give us some examples of what you mean by "shows markup >> rather >>>>> than the final view"? Since this is a follow-up 15-day public >> review, >>>> I >>>>> believe that we are required to show the change tracking from the >>>> previous >>>>> public review. That probably explains everything that you are >> seeing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Rob >>>>> >>>>> Kim Goolsby <kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/06/2010 > 04:15:28 >> >>>> PM: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF >>>>>> Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06 >>>>>> >>>>>> TCADMIN-245 >>>>>> >>>>>> Please make the following changes to this document: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. Please change the Revision History appendix to Appendix B. >>>>>> Appendix B shows in the Table of Contents but the actual header on >>>>>> page 17 of the odt file shows Appendix A. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. The html file's title page shows garbled information. Please >>>>>> regenerate this file, making sure that 'Hidden Paragraphs' & >>>>>> 'Nonprinting Characters' are turned off in the 'View' menu. >>>>>> >>>>>> 3. The pdf file also shows markup rather than the final view. > Please >>>>>> regenerate this file, making sure that 'Hidden Paragraphs' & >>>>>> 'Nonprinting Characters' are turned off in the 'View' menu. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let me know of any questions or comments. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>> Kim >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Kim Goolsby >>>>>> Publications Specialist >>>>>> OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society >>>>>> email: kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org >>>>>> web: www.oasis-open.org >>>>>> phone: 1.734.223.6890 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Kim Goolsby >>>>> Publications Specialist >>>>> OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society >>>>> email: kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org >>>>> web: www.oasis-open.org >>>>> phone: 1.734.223.6890[attachment "state of interop html.png" > deleted >>>>> by Robert Weir/Cambridge/IBM] [attachment "state of interop > pdf.png" >>>>> deleted by Robert Weir/Cambridge/IBM] [attachment "state of interop >>>>> odt.png" deleted by Robert Weir/Cambridge/IBM] >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Kim Goolsby >> Publications Specialist >> OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society >> email: kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org >> web: www.oasis-open.org >> phone: 1.734.223.6890
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]