OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

oic message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06


Correct. Thanks Rob!

Mary



On Oct 7, 2010, at 7:23 PM, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:

> Hi Kim,
> 
> I think Mary was asking to accept all of the changes in the HTML version, 
> but only the changes on the cover and footer on the other versions. 
> 
> Or am I misunderstanding her three requests?
> 
> Making all three documents identical is certainly possible, but then we're 
> not showing change tracking, which we're required to do as well.
> 
> -Rob
> 
> Kim Goolsby <kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/07/2010 05:40:10 PM:
> 
>> 
>> Re: [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF 
>> Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06
>> 
>> The files still don't quite match. For the html, all changes were 
>> approved, so we see no markup. However, the odt & pdf files still 
>> show markup in the appendices. We need all three versions to be 
>> identical. Would you mind accepting all changes in the odt file, 
>> then re-generating it & and the pdf files?
>> 
>> Thanks much!
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:38 PM, <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/07/2010 04:08:24 PM:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Rob,
>>> 
>>>  Please make the following changes:
>>> 
>>> 1. Accept change tracking on cover pages/running footers. The result
>>> is impossible to read. (see html screenshot below)
>>> 
>>> [attachment "2010-10-07_15.57.49.png" deleted by Robert
>> Weir/Cambridge/IBM]
>>> 
>> 
>> OK.
>> 
>> 
>>> 2. I have no idea where the use of gold came from for noting
>>> insertions and deletions. It's not part of the style; please revert to
>> black.
>>> 
>> 
>> I think this is an app setting, not part of the style.  The color of the
>> change tracking varies by the user, so you can distinguish the changes
>> from multiple users.  Why it picked gold for my color is a mystery.  In
>> any case, I overrode the automatic color assignment in
>> Tools\Options\Writer\Changes, to make it all black.
>> 
>>> 3. Since the change marks aren't properly displayed in the html
>>> version, please approve all changes and then produce the html file.
>>> 
>> 
>> Done.
>> 
>>> 
>>> None of these changes should require a new TC vote; please send
>>> updated files to Kim.
>>> 
>> 
>> Attached are the revised files.  Thanks again!
>> 
>> -Rob
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Mary
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Oct 7, 2010, at 9:52 AM, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Kim,
>>>> 
>>>> What you will see with the ODT file will depend on your view mode in
>> your
>>>> app.
>>>> 
>>>> If you are using OpenOffice.org you can go to Edit/Changes/Show and
>> you
>>>> should see change tracking.  That should reveal Appendix B as well. 
> My
>> 
>>>> guess is the TOC inconsistency is just  a limitation in OO.  But it
>> looks
>>>> right to me if you enable show change tracking.  Of course, after 
> the
>>>> review, when we "accept" all changes, these issues go away as well.
>>>> 
>>>> If you need the ODT file to show the changes by default, you can 
> just
>>>> re-save the document after enabling that setting.  Or if you want I
>> can
>>>> upload a new version with that enabled.  But before I do that, could
>> you
>>>> try it on your machine and let me know whether there are any other
>> changes
>>>> required, or whether that clears up the other inconsistencies you 
> were
>> 
>>>> reporting?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> -Rob
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Kim Goolsby <kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/07/2010 
> 08:19:15
>> AM:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Subject:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Re: [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF
>>>>> Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>> 
>>>>> The odt file does not show the markup, just the html & pdf files 
> do.
>>>>> I've attached pictures of each file's title page to illustrate what 
> I
>> 
>>>> mean.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also, the odt file shows two appendix A's. The html & pdf files 
> show
>>>>> Appendix A & B.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The odt file is different from the html & pdf files in two aspects.
>>>>> So, it appears that the odt file was not used to generate the pdf &
>>>>> html files.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I believe that all the files should look like the attached odt 
> (once
>>>>> the appendix numbering [lettering] is corrected). Mary will correct
>>>>> me if I'm wrong but I haven't QC'd other specs at this stage that
>>>>> show markup. Instead, a diff file was delivered with the spec.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please let me know of any other questions and comments.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Kim
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:14 PM, <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>> Kim,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can you give us some examples of what you mean by "shows markup
>> rather
>>>>> than the final view"?   Since this is a follow-up 15-day public
>> review,
>>>> I
>>>>> believe that we are required to show the change tracking from the
>>>> previous
>>>>> public review.  That probably explains everything that you are
>> seeing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Rob
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kim Goolsby <kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> wrote on 10/06/2010 
> 04:15:28
>> 
>>>> PM:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [oic] Changes required to submitted document - The State of ODF
>>>>>> Interoperability Version 1.0 Committee Draft 06
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> TCADMIN-245
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please make the following changes to this document:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1. Please change the Revision History appendix to Appendix B.
>>>>>> Appendix B shows in the Table of Contents but the actual header on
>>>>>> page 17 of the odt file shows Appendix A.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2. The html file's title page shows garbled information. Please
>>>>>> regenerate this file, making sure that 'Hidden Paragraphs' &
>>>>>> 'Nonprinting Characters' are turned off in the 'View' menu.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 3. The pdf file also shows markup rather than the final view. 
> Please
>>>>>> regenerate this file, making sure that 'Hidden Paragraphs' &
>>>>>> 'Nonprinting Characters' are turned off in the 'View' menu.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please let me know of any questions or comments.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Kim
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Kim Goolsby
>>>>>> Publications Specialist
>>>>>> OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society
>>>>>> email: kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org
>>>>>> web: www.oasis-open.org
>>>>>> phone: 1.734.223.6890
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Kim Goolsby
>>>>> Publications Specialist
>>>>> OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society
>>>>> email: kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org
>>>>> web: www.oasis-open.org
>>>>> phone: 1.734.223.6890[attachment "state of interop html.png" 
> deleted
>>>>> by Robert Weir/Cambridge/IBM] [attachment "state of interop 
> pdf.png"
>>>>> deleted by Robert Weir/Cambridge/IBM] [attachment "state of interop
>>>>> odt.png" deleted by Robert Weir/Cambridge/IBM]
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Kim Goolsby
>> Publications Specialist
>> OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society
>> email: kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org 
>> web: www.oasis-open.org
>> phone: 1.734.223.6890



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]