Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"
2008/6/14 jose lorenzo <firstname.lastname@example.org>: > Contrast this to ODF, where specifically extensions are defined as the addition of distinctly named element nodes, and as long as these use (are qualified with) a different namespace than those used in the standard, you can still maintain "conformance". Which is a facet of XML - not ODF or ooxml. Some may not think this should be part of ODF, others do. It is a fact and something that exists. Like adding libraries to the C standard. You may not like it, others will like it. embrace and extend? It is a possibility we have to live with. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk