[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.)
2008/6/19 Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com>: > I don't think we are hear to solve the "interoperability quagmire". I > believe all we need to worry about is > a) how well various applications conform to, or utilize the ODF standard. > b) identify problem areas that need to be brought to the attention of the > ODF TC (if that's the right place for changing the ODF standard). I doubt > we are here to change the standard itself. There are other TC's for that > job. > > If that is the given "goal" of this TC, I hope that's not right or we're wasting our time Shawn. We're here to define the goals if the TC. >=3 Oasis members requested this work. Up to us to scope the TC work. then we only need to worry about how > to test the conformity, and how to identify problem areas. Which takes us > square back to defining profiles and tests. All other discussion becomes > OT. More specifically, we only need to worry about drafting the charter to > allow these activities, and to avoid clouding the issue with the other > interpretations of "interop". With the level of interest in interop I'm suggesting the focus shift to your b above. Review the standard to seek areas where interop could be aided and feed back proposals to the main TC for changes. Testing for compliance then becomes secondary, although a clear means of finding interop (untestable areas) issues. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]