[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
Dave Pawson wrote: > What to do about a clause such as > > 2.4.2 Base Settings > > The <config:config-item> element contains all base settings. The value > of the setting is stored in the element. > > This is (barely) informative. > No shall. > No may > Not marked as informative. Would it be too much to assume that any clause that doesn't specify "may" (that is, specifically tells us that there is a choice or "free will" of some sort) - simply be considered obligatory? That way, we do narrow the freedom of implementer, but in return we get much more (and in much less time) interoperability.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]