[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
2008/6/28 marbux <marbux@gmail.com>: > I just realized that your discussion of round-tripping as used in the > da Vinci plug-ins also ignores and simply deflects from discussion of > the absolute requirement of high-fidelity integration with existing > silos of data stored in legacy formats as set forth in my use case's > Market 5. And of course it ignores all user requirements for > round-tripping documents with apps that do not support ODF, without > data loss. Round trip with an application that does not support ODF seems a dead end Paul. > > Many users need to hold two way conversations with apps that do not > support ODF. E.g., in the law office market, many major law firms need > to round-trip documents between WordPerfect and MS Word for > conversations with clients and opposing counsel, in the negotiation of > a document's language. Whether such feats are accomplished through a > common intermediary language or by direct conversions of documents, > the issue of feature mismatches in the respective metadata languages > must be resolved to accomplish round-tripping. As above. If the other app doesn't support ODF that's a no go area as I see it. If you want to propose that, IMHO that's a feature request? > > There unquestionably is such a market requirement. +1. This list is not the place to support it. > > Rob also attacks the very notion of enabling, through the ODF standard > and the profile-related work on the OIIC TC, any non-lossy conversions > between ODF and other formats. ISO is starting to look at that. Not through OIIC though. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]