Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?

[dale <dale@vampireducks.com>]

+1


Dave Pawson wrote:
> I think I'm doing a Rob Weir.
>
> Proposal for consensus: Please respond if you support it.
>
> "There will be no deliverable addressing the ideas of 'pixel perfect' as
> used on this list. "
>
> Please respond or you'll have one mans version of consensus.
>
>
> 2008/7/1 Art Petrzelka <art@complum.com>:
>
>   
>> Let's get the right scale here.
>>
>> My list of must haves:
>> correct pagination
>> correct margins and tabs
>> identical line breaks
>> proper scaling - e. g. lines or blocks don't overlap
>> font substitution is appropriate and doesn't throw off pagination
>> bullets don't turn into an empty rectangle
>>     
>
> Nice, but no coconut. What does 'correct', 'proper' mean
> The last two are system dependent (installed fonts?) so inapproprite?
>
> I guess identical line breaks is back to typesetting again?
> Too close to pixel perfect for me (tell me if I'm wrong).
> Identical pagination probably depends on line breaks ultimately
> (tell me if I'm wrong), so -1
>
> So this definition, whilst better (loosely named layout perfect in the past)
> is still -1 from me.
>
> I'd like something like this, but not if we can't define it.
>
> regards
>
>
>
>
>