OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

op-advisory-council message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: Adding CC-0 to OASIS Open Projects


That is exactly the plan. Bring in the donation as CC0 and then relicense under something permissive. 

--
Jim Jagielski
Brief? Mobile

On Jan 31, 2020, at 5:12 PM, Joshua R. Simmons <oasis@joshsimmons.com> wrote:

ï
Perhaps the OP can choose one of the seven OASIS selected licenses, accept the contribution under CC-0, then relicense it?

Ideally, the OP wouldn't need to bend over backwards this way for the contributor, but I understand these may be extinuating circumstances.

I'd still recommend the OP at least *try* to get the contributor to allow contribution under a different license. 

@joshsimmons (he/him) | bluesomewhere on Freenode
joshsimmons.com | +1 (707) 600-6098

ad astra per aspera ð


On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, at 23:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
FWIW, the FSF recommends CC0 for public domain


I remain +1.

--
Jim Jagielski
Brief? Mobile

On Jan 31, 2020, at 5:00 PM, Jim Jagielski <jimjag@gmail.com> wrote:
ïOops. My mistake. I had thought that CC0 was approved. I must have been confused. In any case, since it is as close to public domain as you can get, you can consume it and relicense under something else. 

--
Jim Jagielski
Brief? Mobile

On Jan 31, 2020, at 4:58 PM, Jim Jagielski <jimjag@gmail.com> wrote:
ïCC0 *is* an open source License, approved by OSI. Itâs as close to public domain as you can get. I have no issues with it being officially accepted by OASIS. In fact, our policy should be that any OSI license is OK. But I can see the advantage of keeping the list down to a manageable number. 

--
Jim Jagielski
Brief? Mobile

On Jan 31, 2020, at 4:32 PM, Carol Geyer <carol.geyer@oasis-open.org> wrote:
ï
One of our current Open Projects needs to set up a repo under the CC-0 license, which is not one of the seven OASIS currently supports. (The OP wants to accept a major technical contribution from a large auditing firm which has a conflict-of-interest policy that requires them to only contribute under CC-0.)

Before we recommend to the OASIS Board that CC-0 be added, we wanted to see if Advisory Council members have any thoughts--pro or con--on CC-0.

This is very time-sensitive, so please let us know as soon as possible if you have any views on this.

Many thanks,
Carol



--
Carol Geyer
Chief Development Officer
Open Source and Standards Communities
OASIS





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]