We need your input on: mandatory vs optional, Header, id, version, timestamp, sender

[<duncan@sfractal.com>]

So 5 of the 29 LSC members have weighed in within 24 hours. Ideally I'd like to give at least another day or so to hear from a few others - and not just because my view is losing at the moment :-).

And it's a slightly more nuanced vote that 3 to 2 since I read Dave's note as for most of Allan's proposal but agreeing with me that timestamp should be optional (ie for timestamp its 3/2 the other way).

Everyone else - please let us know your opinions. Even if your opinion is "I don't care either way, just get on with it" - that is valuable input also (and shows you are listening and care).

Duncan Sparrell

sFractal Consulting LLC

iPhone, iTypo, iApologize

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [openc2-lang] Re: [EXT] [openc2-lang] RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE:
[openc2-lang] mandatory vs optional, Header, id, version, timestamp,
sender
From: Bret Jordan <Bret_Jordan@symantec.com>
Date: Thu, January 25, 2018 3:29 pm
To: "Brule, Joseph M" <jmbrule@radium.ncsc.mil>, "'duncan@sfractal.com'"
<duncan@sfractal.com>, openc2-lang <openc2-lang@lists.oasis-open.org>

So Duncan and Joe are against it.  Allan, Bret, and Dave are for it. 

Bret

---