OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

openc2-lang message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] [openc2-lang] 5/8 LSC Meeting Notes

The minutes include the following statement:


Wrt proposal to include all the Arguments in the Language Specification (as opposed to some in Language Specification and some in the Acutator Profiles), Joe Brule objected. Duncan and Joe spoke offline after the meeting and Joe agreed to withdraw his objection (ie agree to put in the Language Specification the arguments in the existing Actuator Profile). It was agreed this could be revisited later if the list became unwieldy or churn was too great.


This is accurate as stated but not complete.


The complete proposal is to:

1.       Include all Args created by all Profiles in the Language Specification *at the time the LS is published*.

2.       Include a statement in the LS to refer to a specific document for the latest list of Args created *after the LS is published*


Every time a new LS is published, the editors can choose at that time to incorporate all definitions from all profiles in the LS.  Or they could choose to not duplicate that content and refer readers to the source.


The L-SC then has the option to publish or not a new LS every time the AP-SC updates any profile.  If a new LS is not published, then the profile is still normative for content defined in the profile.    What we cannot allow is two normative documents that define conflicting information.





From: openc2-lang@lists.oasis-open.org <openc2-lang@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of duncan@sfractal.com
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 3:55 PM
To: openc2-lang <openc2-lang@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [openc2-lang] 5/8 LSC Meeting Notes


I apologize but I was slower at updating the notes than I'd intended. I've now included text for section 2 (material changes) of what I think we agreed to at the meeting. Those present, please review and tell me if I misrepresented. Those not present, please review and let us know if you disagree with any of our conclusions.


The notes can be found on Lucid at https://meet.lucidmeetings.com/meeting/187957. I have attached a pdf of that page as well.


Duncan Sparrell

sFractal Consulting LLC

iPhone, iTypo, iApologize

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]