OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

openc2-lang message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [openc2-lang] Fwd: mistake inside oc2ls-v1.0-cs02

THAT is what the comment meant.  I was not tracking. 


That is something we should have taken care of.  I recall that there was some churn in the action table so rather than constantly rewriting the code in OIF,  we were going to wait until it settled down and do the renumber once. 


Brian is correct, we should have renumbered it, Brian is correct, itâs just an index so doesnât really matter. 


IF we are going to do this, then we should take care of it ASAP.  Right now, all the cool kids are using JSON serialization, but we would want to address any renumbering BEFORE people start implementing protobuf, cbor or whatever




From: openc2-lang@lists.oasis-open.org <openc2-lang@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Brian Berliner
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 9:50 AM
To: duncan sfractal.com <duncan@sfractal.com>
Cc: openc2-lang <openc2-lang@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [openc2-lang] Fwd: mistake inside oc2ls-v1.0-cs02


There are a lot more numbers than â21â missing in the Action table. We removed some early actions from the table before we released the final version. I also thought that it looked weird that we didnât re-number the table to make it perfectly sequential, but in reality they are just identifiers and it doesnât matter what the number is... but the number assigned in the table should never change. 


For all of us currently, we use JSON, so the numbers are not even used at all, so this is reserved for when we add binary encodings. 


So, yes. 21 is missing (and lots of others). That is weird, but by design, and it actually doesnât matter that they are not perfectly sequential in the table.... Except for the fact that I had to just write this exactly because they are not perfectly sequential in the finals spec!




On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:49 AM duncan sfractal.com <duncan@sfractal.com> wrote:

The attached email went to the public comments email. Since I am not sure everyone monitors that channel, I am forwarding to LSC to look at


iPhone, iTypo, iApologize


Duncan Sparrell

sFractal Consulting, LLC

I welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at http://vsre.info/


From: openc2-comment@lists.oasis-open.org <openc2-comment@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Vincent ROME <vincent.rome@hotmail.fr>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 6:16 AM
To: openc2-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [openc2-comment] mistake inside oc2ls-v1.0-cs02



I'm currently reading the specification and try to make my own python implementation and I found that : 

In page 29 of the oc2ls-v1.0-cs02

The number "21" is miss inside the board 








[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]