[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: OC2LS CS02
We got our feet tangled up in process and then stumbled in the meeting yesterday. Some points: While Oasis Specifications (OS), Committee Specifications (CS), Committee Specification Public Review Drafts, Committee Specification Drafts (CSD) and Working Drafts are all numbered, the numbers do not necessarily have work in lockstep.
This can end up with numbering similar to OC2LS-01.0-WD01, OC2LS-01.0-WD02, OC2LS-01.0-WD03 == > OC2LS-01.0-CSD01, OC2LS-01.0-WD04.
The sequence above could continue, if the of CSPRD2 is released for public review as OC2LS-01.0-WD04, OC2LS-01.0-WD05, OC2LS-01.0-WD06 == > OC2LS-01.0-CSD02 == > OC2LS-01.0-CSPRD01, OC2LS-01.0-WD07. Note that these are all still documents
on the way to 1.0
The OASIS process only allows Errata only for Specifications S. Therefore we have no eratta document. What we produced was
OpenC2 Language Specification v1.0 Committee Specification 02. I hope this explains some of the confusion about the numbering process that was in yesterday’s meeting. tc |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]