Re: [openc2] Re: MD as the Normative Version?

[Dave Lemire <dave.lemire@g2-inc.com>]

Do we win a prize if we get toÂ+1,000? :-)

Dave

David P. Lemire, CISSP
 OpenC2 Technical Committee Executive Secretary
 OpenC2 Implementation Considerations SC Co-chair
 Contractor support to NSA
Email: dave.lemire@g2-inc.com
Office: 301-575-5190 / Mobile: 240-938-9350p

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 2:52 PM duncan sfractal.com <duncan@sfractal.com> wrote:

+ another 100 for MD as normative version.

Duncan Sparrell
sFractal Consulting LLC
iPhone, iTypo, iApologize
I welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at http://vsre.info/


ïOn 9/21/18, 2:59 AM, "Trey Darley" <openc2@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of trey@newcontext.com> wrote:

  +100

  On 20.09.2018 21:15:50, Stefan Hagen wrote:
  > I think markdown (source format) as normative variant is a solid choice.
  >
  > We have structure in these documents that allows referencing individual
  > words by references like section paragraph # sentence # word # for any
  > commenter.
  >
  > IMX line numbers often destroy any usability aspect for implementers and
  > commenters alike, as the commenters have trouble copying the content for a
  > constructive CURRENT_SITUATION vs. SUGGESTED_SITUATION
  > feedback and implementers also love these stray numbers that get
  > injected in the pdf output when line numbering is set.
  >
  > Many centuries worked with books that had no line numbers :-)
  >
  > All the best,
  > Stefan.

  --
  Cheers,
  Trey
  ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
  Director of Standards Development, New Context
  gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F 018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
  ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
  --
  "The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems,
  takes longer." --Edward R. Murrow