[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sdo] Re: [opencsa-liaison] SDO TC Status
hi bryan, thx, As i think i said before, privately, if the TC wants to shut down, there is a simple and straightforward way to do that in the TC Process. All it takes is a Full Majority Vote of the TC (see section 2.15) Note: the other 2 methods, TC admin and Board, are meant to take care of TCs that have either "disappeared" or "gone rogue". cheers, jeff On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:42 AM, Bryan Aupperle wrote: > That is indeed the case. > > Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D. > STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect > WW Center of Excellence for Enterprise Systems & Banking Center of > Excellence Application Integration Architect > > Research Triangle Park, NC > +1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508) > Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com > > > > From: Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com> > To: "Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> > Cc: Bryan Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "opencsa-liaison@lists.oasis-open.org > " <opencsa-liaison@lists.oasis-open.org>, "sdo@lists.oasis-open.org" > <sdo@lists.oasis-open.org> > Date: 01/26/2011 07:11 PM > Subject: Re: [opencsa-liaison] SDO TC Status > > > > hi, > Actually, based upon what i've seen. I think the "real" proposal is > to close the TC. > The way I understand it, they haven't completed any of the > deliverables, and have no desire to do so. > > Please correct me, if i got that wrong. > cheers, > jeff > On Jan 26, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Patil, Sanjay wrote: > > > > > Hi Bryan, > > > > If stopping the SDO 3.0 work is final (that is, the TC does not > > intend to pick up the work later), then I think it will amount to > > changing the chartered deliverables of the TC, in which case the TC > > might want to re-charter itself! On the other hand, if stopping the > > SDO 3.0 work reflects just a temporary pause in the TC’s operations > > (for the SDO 3 work) due to the current resource/commitment > > situation, then that is a different issue and might not warrant re- > > chartering, etc, IMO. > > > > Best wishes, > > Sanjay > > > > From: Bryan Aupperle [mailto:aupperle@us.ibm.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 1:37 PM > > To: opencsa-liaison@lists.oasis-open.org > > Cc: sdo@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: [opencsa-liaison] SDO TC Status > > > > Due to changing priorities of the companies currently represented by > > voting members of the SDO TC, the TC has concluded that it is > > appropriate to stop work on SDO 3.0. > > > > While much work has been done on the 3.0 specifications, it is clear > > that there are insufficient commitments to complete these > > specifications and work on a test suite has not even started. > > > > This decision is solely based on the current lack of resources and > > commitments. > > > > By now, internal communications should have taken place so this news > > should not be a surprise to anyone, but it is appropriate for me to > > notify the liaison subcommittee as the representative from the SDO > TC. > > > > Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D. > > STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect > > WW Center of Excellence for Enterprise Systems & Banking Center of > > Excellence Application Integration Architect > > > > Research Triangle Park, NC > > +1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508) > > Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com > > -- > Jeff > Mischkinsky > jeff > .mischkinsky@oracle.com > Sr. Director, Oracle Fusion > Middleware > > +1(650)506-1975 > and Web Services > Standards > 500 > Oracle Parkway, M/S 2OP9 > Oracle > Redwood > Shores, CA 94065 > > > > > > > > > > -- Jeff Mischkinsky jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com Sr. Director, Oracle Fusion Middleware +1(650)506-1975 and Web Services Standards 500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 2OP9 Oracle Redwood Shores, CA 94065
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]