Mark,
I would be concerned if the panel discussion turns into a
SCA vs. JBI debate, primarily because the audience would also be interested
IMO in understanding the value proposition, implementation status, etc, of
SCA by itself.
I think that someone (perhaps Peter!) should submit a
proposal for an independent session/BOF on SCA and (not vs.)
JBI.
Thanks,
Sanjay
I'm working on the panel session abstract. Wait and see what that's
got because it may be relevant.
Mark.
On 6 Nov 2007, at 15:52, Mike Edwards wrote:
Peter,
Would you be willing to create a
session proposal on this topic (with potential help from others)?
Yours,
Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO. Co
Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC. IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146,
Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain. Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014
Mobile: +44-7802-467431 Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
Jones, Steve G wrote: > Add in th non vocal me as well as on
both. But it needn't be limited to people on both, it would be good to see
people who aren't doing both explaining the different
reasons. > > Yes it is early, but it is one of the most common
questions out there. Will SCA and JBI end up competing or will we be grown
up and work together. >
I'm cooperating fully with
myself on this issue :-)
Peter.
Unless stated otherwise above: IBM
United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
----
Mark Little
JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place,
107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire,
SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration
No. 3798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters
(USA) and David Owens (Ireland)
|