[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [opendocument-users] Improvement submissions to the ODF-TC?
"Cody, John (OFT)" <John.Cody@oft.state.ny.us> wrote on 05/15/2009 12:42:33 PM: > > What is the easiest way for a user to determine the content of > proposals that have been submitted for consideration to the ODF-TC? > For example, if an implementer touts having made multiple proposals > to improve ODF, but then also makes implementation choices in which > it criticizes deficiencies in ODF, how does a user like me determine > if the proposals that were submitted were aimed at addressing those > deficiencies, or not? > > I prefer online responses, please. Thank you, John > I think I understand the context of the question better now, so let me point out two additional items which may be of interest and will save you from having to go through meeting minutes. There is an inherent conflict when developing any periodic product, when a software application, a standard, a newsletter, whatever, between adding new and useful content versus delivering the already useful content that you have. Every day you spend adding new features further delays giving users the benefits of what you already have. By last November, the ODF TC had completed the features it had initially set out to do for ODF 1.2. We had completed our goals. But we still had 50 or so member proposals, and this number was increasing. By decision of the TC, with no objections, we agreed to limit the number of additional proposals we would consider for ODF 1.2. You can see the agreement in the meeting minutes here: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200811/msg00124.html On December 8th, again without objection, the TC agreed to have a vote on which of the remaining member proposals would be considered for ODF 1.2. This agreement is in the minutes here: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200812/msg00055.html You can see that step #4 called for members to reiterate their proposals if they wished to have them included in the ballot. The list of reiterated proposals is listed here: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200812/msg00089.html We voted on the list and the results are here: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200812/msg00156.html All eligible TC members voted. I'm sure that there are a number of proposals that were made by members which have been abandoned by them, or superseded by other changes, or thought by the proposer to be of lesser importance and deferrable to ODF-Next. It isn't my job to track these. It is the responsibility of the proposer to advance their proposals through the process. So you might check that list of reiterated proposals carefully. If you don't see the proposals you have in mind listed there, then you might ask the proposer why they did not ask for their proposals to be voted on. Regards, -Rob
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]