[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Implementor notes
Doug Mahugh <Doug.Mahugh@microsoft.com> wrote on 06/17/2009 07:46:07 PM: > > Hi Sander, > > I agree that it would be very helpful to have implementer notes for > more than one implementation. In this particular case (the trailing > slash on embedded objects), we have notes for one implementation > stating that it follows the standard, but that doesn't add much > information to the discussion because that approach was already > documented in the standard itself. Implementer notes for those > implementations that do not follow the standard would be even more > useful to current and future implementers. I assume we'd all agree > that it's more important to document a decision to deviate from the > standard, than a decision to conform to the standard. > Of course, not all deviations from the spec are intentional or even known the implementer. So that is why a wiki version of this would be useful, so it could be filled in based on experience with the app after it is in the field. So maybe a standard reporting template from the implementor to kick things off, which some 3rd party can pull into a wiki or similar collaborative environment, etc. -Rob
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]