Giles, thanks very much for posting this. I agree with Jeff that is has
a great deal of merit – and so far is also one of the most readable and relevant
documents to the work of the TC.
I also agree with Jeff
that discussing the differences between your model and that of Pinyol2007Ontology
[1] would be very useful to the TC, particularly in our terminology and model
development stage.
Perhaps you could lead us
through such a discussion on the next call? Or even start with an email that
contrasts/compares the two models from your POV?
Best,
=Drummond
[1] http://www.iiia.csic.es/~jsabater/Publications/2007-TrustWS.pdf
From: Giles Hogben
[mailto:Giles.Hogben@enisa.europa.eu]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008
7:35 AM
To: orms@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [orms] Reputation Model +
Comments
OK - I'm
now posting this as a member of the group
Hi All,
I've just joined this group with Observer status since I don't have a lot of
time to work on it. I work for the European Network and Information Security
Agency (ENISA) and have some experience in =
reputation systems esp security and privacy issues (a report I co-edited =
is one of your refs). I wanted to contribute a couple of things.
1. A while back I sketched (see attachment) - a language which fits a lot of
your use-cases - it's quite skeletal but I think it has some useful ideas.
Don't be put off by the vote terminology - it's about reputation, not e-voting.
This was just a personal project and not part of any larger initiative.
2. I saw some of the discussions and I wanted to say I think it's very
important that any protocol is symettric - in the sense that you can a.
nest/recurse reputation as much as you want and b.check reputation =
reciprocally.
3. Reputation is fundamentally about agreggated beliefs on an assertion. There
should therefore be work on integrating with SAML.
Any thoughts on the attached welcome. I'd be happy to join a call and take
people through it some time (but not in the next couple of weeks probably as
I'm very busy),
Regards,
Giles Hogben
(See attached file: reputation2.pdf)