[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [orms] Groups - Memo on the discussion for F2F of ORMS TC on Nov. 10, 2008 (ORMS-20081110.doc) uploaded
Nat, I took a look at the doc. I think the mathematical model is incisive and apt as far as a reference model for Trust Score is set up for discussion. I also think the Trust-score model requirements, protocol requirements are a good start and necessary. Further analysis and review should tell if they are sufficient, as we go along. I also agree with the refinement to the definition of Reputation - with one caveat: "Reputation is a subjective evaluation of the assertion about a subject being true based on factual and/or subjective data about it, and is used as one of the factors for establishing trust on that subject for a specific purpose." Did you mean to say subjective evaluation or 'objective evaluation'? After all, if we had a subjective evaluation - we can throw some quantitative value at it and forget about a formal math-model. True that the assertion is based on a factual (binary) data or subjective (n a non-binary scale) data which is perhaps based on an empirical model. Also - along the lines of the question I raised towards the end of f2f (which I later tried to understand myself :)) shouldn't there be a requirement to ensure reproducibility of the result - given identical inputs? For that reason I propose that the definition of Reputation Score: "A Reputation Score, z in Z, is a subjective probability assigned by the Reputation Engine for the assertion being true." be modified by replacing "subjective" with "statistical" or empirical (I am still unsure which one is appropriate). What is also not clear is how the normalization properties of the model provable - the intent of the model being to make portability meaningful. Regards, -mani -----Original Message----- From: n-sakimura@nri.co.jp [mailto:n-sakimura@nri.co.jp] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 2:53 AM To: orms@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [orms] Groups - Memo on the discussion for F2F of ORMS TC on Nov. 10, 2008 (ORMS-20081110.doc) uploaded Here is the link to the document that I created to capture the discussion between 4:00pm and 5:30pm at F2F at IIW2008b. -- Mr. Nat Sakimura The document named Memo on the discussion for F2F of ORMS TC on Nov. 10, 2008 (ORMS-20081110.doc) has been submitted by Mr. Nat Sakimura to the OASIS Open Reputation Management Systems (ORMS) TC document repository. Document Description: Memo that captures the discussion made during 4pm to 5:30pm at the F2F, which was further abstracted by =nat in the evening. View Document Details: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=29986 Download Document: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/29986/ORMS-20081110.do c PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. -OASIS Open Administration
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]