Hi Jim, I have a few comments on issue 27 but basically it’s almost done so I’d put that at the top of the list.
I added a comment to issue 32 – yes, it could be considered a subset of 28 but I would like to include non-normative guidance about ordering relationships because 32 does required
ordering of the relationships. Yes I know that you will recommend that such guidance should live in the core spec, and you don’t even want it there because it is a standard RDF extension, but I still need to say it.
So next priority should be 28, and finally 29. I believe it was at last meeting that David said 29 would be useful for something one of your IBM teams is doing. 12 seems to
be done.
Thanks, Martin
|
|
|
Dr. Martin Sarabura |
From: oslc-ccm@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:oslc-ccm@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Jim Amsden
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 2:26 PM
To: OSLC CCM TC (oslc-ccm@lists.oasis-open.org) <oslc-ccm@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [oslc-ccm] Remaining open CM issues
These are the open CM issues. All will require some discussion. Except for OSLCCCM-12, these were created by Martin, so Martin - how would you like
to prioritize these issues?
OSLCCCM-27 New type ChangeAuthorization needed for CM spec
OSLCCCM-28 Need a decomposition reference
OSLCCCM-29 References to before and after states of affected resources
OSLCCCM-32 Ability to associate a set of change requests to a parent change request
OSLCCCM-12 Initial Change Management Specification Updates
Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member
OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data
919-525-6575