Fw: Completed split of paging from LDP spec

[Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>]

FYI

For those who don't pay too close attention
to activities within W3C LDP Working Group I thought I'd share a change
with the LDP specification.  Basically, we realized that the paging
support could be somewhat easily factored out into a separate LDP extensions
specification specifically about paging.  This would hopefully simplify
the base spec and not hold up the key aspects of it if there was some additional
needs for paging.  Also there was a desire to look a little closer
on how we could provide some additional guidance in paging to better handle
cases to prevent lossy-ness of data.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> http://open-services.net

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:22 PM
Subject: Completed split of paging from LDP spec
To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org"
<public-ldp-wg@w3.org>


I have completed my action from last WG meeting [1] to
factor out [2], [3] the paging and ordering content into a separate extension
specification [4], [5].

So the LDP spec [2] is in better position for WG review.

Note: The LDP-Paging draft is just a crude copy of the
content from the latest LDP draft.  The LDP-Paging editor's will be
working to tidy it up.

[1] - http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-02-17#resolution_5
[2] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html
[3] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.ttl
[4] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-paging.html
[5] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-paging.ttl

- Steve Speicher