Re: [oslc-core] Agenda for this week's OSLC CORE TC meeting

[Martin P Pain <martinpain@uk.ibm.com>]

As I also cannot attend the meeting, here
are my votes. (I've included Nick's ones from his previous email for ease
of reference):

issue
23 - Should a ServiceProviderCatalog or ServiceProvider be an LDPC?
Nick: +1 for the current proposal.
Martin: I do not believe this is ready to be voted on,
as it needs more fleshing out as to how it would work.

issue
29 - Allow for selection dialogs for service providers
Nick: +1 for the current proposal.
Martin: +1 for the current proposal.

issue 9 - Bootstrapping discovery
Nick: 0 (not really against this, but not convinced it's of great value)
Martin: +1 for my own proposal (just added a comment replying
to the alternative proposal).

issue 15 - Allow client to request different icon sizes for resource preview
Nick: +1 for the proposal with the change suggested by me in comment https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-15?focusedCommentId=60556&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-60556


issue 20 - Service provider should describe domain/scope
Nick: -1 on the proposal as currently written, +1 on the wording provided
by David - see my comments in the issue.

Martin Pain
Software Developer - Green Hat
Rational Test Virtualization Server, Rational Test Control Panel

Phone: +44 (0)1962 815317 | Tie-Line: 37245317 E-mail: martinpain@uk.ibm.com Find me on:  and within IBM on:

IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in
England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North
Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU 



From:      
 Nick Crossley <ncrossley@us.ibm.com>
To:      
 "Sarabura, Martin"
<msarabura@ptc.com>, oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:      
 18/08/2015 17:51
Subject:    
   Re: [oslc-core]
Agenda for this week's OSLC CORE TC meeting
Sent by:    
   <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

I cannot attend the meeting (out on
vacation this week), but here are my votes on the issues noted in the agenda:
issue
23 - Should a ServiceProviderCatalog or ServiceProvider be an LDPC?
Nick: +1 for the current proposal.

issue
29 - Allow for selection dialogs for service providers
Nick: +1 for the current proposal.

issue 9 - Bootstrapping discovery
Nick: 0 (not really against this, but not convinced it's of great value)

issue 15 - Allow client to request different icon sizes for resource preview
Nick: +1 for the proposal with the change suggested by me in comment https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-15?focusedCommentId=60556&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-60556

issue 20 - Service provider should describe domain/scope
Nick: -1 on the proposal as currently written, +1 on the wording provided
by David - see my comments in the issue.

Because I have been out this week and last week, I have not yet addressed my action item of writing up a scenario for how to determine the usage of a particular LDPC.

Nick.

"Sarabura, Martin" ---08/18/2015 09:31:47 AM---There are a few issues that Jim and I feel are close to ready for a vote; they are listed on the age

From: "Sarabura, Martin" <msarabura@ptc.com>
To: "OASIS (oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org)" <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 08/18/2015 09:31 AM
Subject: [oslc-core] Agenda for this week's OSLC CORE TC meeting
Sent by: <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

There are a few issues that Jim and I feel are close to ready for a vote;
they are listed on the agenda:
https://wiki.oasis-open.org/oslc-core/Meetings/Telecon2015.08.20
 
Please review these issues to help prepare for the meeting on Thursday.
 
Regards,
 
Martin Sarabura
R&D Fellow, PTC
 


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU