RE: [oslc-core] Review of OSLC Discovery

[Jad El-Khoury <jad@kth.se>]

Hi Jim,

 

Things are getting clear, but I have still have some doubts with stating that a Service resource can be both a Local resource as well as a LDPC.

 

In your feedback, you say that “Local resource is about the representation of the content, not necessarily its URIs. The shape constraint for ServiceProvider just indicates the Service resources’ properties must also be included in the representation of the ServiceProvider - it doesn’t require them to be blank nodes or have fragment URIs within that representation”.

 

But in the Resource Shape specs (https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/oslc-core/trunk/specs/resource-shape.html), it is clearly stated that for a oslc:LocalResource, “The object resource MUST be identified with a blank node.”

 

And, when you say above “Local resource is about the representation of the content”, this sounds more like about the Representation being “inline”, rather than the value-type being LocalResource?

 

When it comes to the constraints of the ServiceProvider resource, the oslc:service property is currently constraint to:

representation: inline à This agrees with your description

value-type: AnyResource à This means it can also be an oslc:LocalResource, which MUST be a blank node.

 

Would representation: inline & value-type: Resource be more appropriate?

 

I may be over-interpreting the text, and this could stem from the usual confusion I have between Representation and Value-type. But I‘ll try one last time …

 

regards

______________________________

Jad El-khoury, PhD

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Mechatronics Division

Brinellvägen 83, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

Phone: +46(0)8 790 6877 Mobile: +46(0)70 773 93 45

jad@kth.se, www.kth.se

 

From: oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Jim Amsden
Sent: 12 February 2016 18:33
To: Jad El-Khoury
Cc: oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Review of OSLC Discovery

 

Jad,
Thanks for the review. Comments embedded in the attached document.

Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member
OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data
919-525-6575




From:        Jad El-Khoury <jad@kth.se>
To:        "oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org" <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:        02/11/2016 04:23 PM
Subject:        [oslc-core] Review of OSLC Discovery
Sent by:        <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

Hi,
 
I read through Discovery, and I just have a couple of questions (& some minor comments). Please see attached.
 
Most likely, this stems from my confusion with the relationship between OSLC2.0 resources and LDPC. It mainly relates to the Service and CreationFactory resources. But might as well double-check if I got it right.
 
regards
______________________________
Jad El-khoury, PhD
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Mechatronics Division
Brinellvägen 83, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Phone: +46(0)8 790 6877 Mobile: +46(0)70 773 93 45
jad@kth.se, www.kth.se
 [attachment "OSLC Discovery.pdf" deleted by Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php