[OASIS Issue Tracker] (OSLCCORE-74) Should the acc namespace be merged with the trs namespace

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=62960#comment-62960 ] 

James Amsden commented on OSLCCORE-74:
--------------------------------------

The acc namespace must be maintained for backward compatibility.


> Should the acc namespace be merged with the trs namespace
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OSLCCORE-74
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-74
>             Project: OASIS OSLC Lifecycle Integration Core (OSLC Core) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: James Amsden
>            Assignee: James Amsden
>              Labels: TRS
>
> Since we're merging the ILDP specification into the TRS specification, there may be little motivation for using different namespaces. However, having another namespace doesn't hurt anything either and might help separate concerns.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)