Re: [oslc-core] trs:Base and LDP container

["Nicholas Crossley" <nick_crossley@us.ibm.com>]

Allowing other container types would seem
to introduce the possibility of breaking compatibility with existing consumers
- those consumers might assume direct containers and require the presence
of the membershipResource and either one of hasMemberRelation or isMemberOfRelation,
and they might ignore any insertedContentRelation triple from an indirect
container.

Nick.



From:      
 "Mr. David Honey"
<DavidHoney@uk.ibm.com>
To:      
 oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:      
 09/01/2016 09:28 AM
Subject:    
   [oslc-core]
trs:Base and LDP container
Sent by:    
   <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

The spec currently requires that a base is a ldp:DirectContainer.
This seems unnecessarily restrictive. Should we allow any valid ldp container
type?