oslc-core message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Groups - OSLC Core Specification 3.0 CSPRD03 uploaded
- From: "Jim Amsden" <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
- To: "OASIS OSLC Core TC Discussion List (oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org)" <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 16:32:06 -0400
Nick,
Yes, the heading for 4.7.2 should be
changed, good public review comment, can you reply there?
re: multiple title and descriptions,
I copied it from Core common properties where it was probably left zero-or-more
for flexibility, but needed to be more specific for ResponseInfo. It should
be zero-or-one.
Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member
OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data
919-525-6575
From:
"Nicholas Crossley"
<nick_crossley@us.ibm.com>
To:
"OASIS OSLC Core
TC Discussion List (oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org)" <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:
06/07/2018 02:36 PM
Subject:
Re: [oslc-core]
Groups - OSLC Core Specification 3.0 CSPRD03 uploaded
Sent by:
<oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
I've fixed a couple of minor typos in
the Core spec, and saw two issues during a review of the Core CSPRD03 draft:- oslc-core.html: Section heading for
4.7.2 seems wrong - the heading seems to apply to the next section. This
section should have a heading of the form "Syntax for oslc.prefix".
Given that there is a separate section for this, and given the discussion
about conformance clauses this morning, I would recommend extracting the
syntax definition for oslc.properties to its own subsection as well.
- ResponseInfo shape - remind me why we
allow multiple occurrences of title and description?
Nick.
From: James
Amsden <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
To: oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: 06/04/2018
09:16 AM
Subject: [oslc-core]
Groups - OSLC Core Specification 3.0 CSPRD03 uploaded
Sent by: <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]