OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

oslc-core message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Combined OSLC Domains and Core TC meeting minutes 20190509

Jim Amsden (IBM):Previous minutes: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oslc-domains/201905/msg00001.html
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Andrew is the scribe
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Minutes approved
Jim Amsden (IBM): Open Project
* Announcement May 8 but points to the old OSLC organization...
* Reorganization of content
* Migration of content
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Andrew asked Chet to create a new GH organisation.
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): https://github.com/oasis-tcs/oslc-core/issues/27
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): .
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): specs will be merged with the ones from domains
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): we need styles + relative refs will need to be updated
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): supporting docs are specs that are not going to be published
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): pub can go away
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): reviews contain spec diffs
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Not sure if we will need to follow the same process in the OP
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Nick: new agenda item to discuss the discrepancy of the Turtle files
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): https://open-services.net/wiki/core/TrackedResourceSet-2.0/index.html
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): TRS 3.0 draft link points to a broken spec
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): TRS 2.0 spec is not linked to
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): redirects were broken for quite a while
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): we should consider always linking to the last reviewed spec in addition to the current WD
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): we wanted to discourage people from browsing the archive
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Jim suggests not to link to the Query 3.0
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): *2.0
Nick Crossley (IBM): To avoid large numbers of broken links and bookmarks, I believe open-services.net/wiki should redirect to archive.open-services.net/wiki
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): one way is to grey out the outdated specs with the red warning
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): another way is only to link to the new versions and in the spec link back
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): https://github.com/OSLC/oslc-site-hugo/blob/master/content/specifications/_index.md
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): There is a number of IBM employees that regularly check the old wikis. Redirects should work properly.
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Jad: If the old pages are used frequently, we should lift them up to the new website.
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Jim: we need to check if the RDF files have diverged from the ones approved by the committee.
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Link to the RDF files: https://github.com/OSLC/oslc-site-hugo/tree/master/content/ns
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): https://github.com/oasis-tcs/oslc-domains/tree/master/open-services-vocabs
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): RDF files should be scripted from hugo
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): There are two scripts for that: one in the reSpec fork and the XSLT transform script.
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): the list is missing tools
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): Links will need to be updated after the OP migration
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): OP migration will also break the links in the spec

Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member
ELM Quality Manager

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]