oslc-core message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Combined OSLC Domains and Core TC meeting minutes 20190509
- From: "Jim Amsden" <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
- To: oslc-domains@lists.oasis-open.org, "OASIS OSLC Core TC Discussion List" <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 12:01:26 -0400
Jim Amsden (IBM):Previous minutes: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oslc-domains/201905/msg00001.html
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): Andrew is the scribe
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): Minutes approved
Jim Amsden
(IBM): Open Project
* Announcement May 8 but points to
the old OSLC organization...
* Reorganization of content
* Migration of content
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): Andrew asked Chet to
create a new GH organisation.
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): https://github.com/oasis-tcs/oslc-core/issues/27
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): .
Templates
OSLC-Core-publishing-instructions
open-services-vocabs
pub
reviews
specs
am
asset
auto
cm
config
contexts
core
ems
images
perfmon
qm
query
recon
rm
schema
trs
styles
supporting-docs
sketch-images
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): specs will be merged
with the ones from domains
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): we need styles + relative
refs will need to be updated
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): supporting docs are
specs that are not going to be published
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): pub can go away
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): reviews contain spec
diffs
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): Not sure if we will
need to follow the same process in the OP
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): Nick: new agenda item
to discuss the discrepancy of the Turtle files
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): https://open-services.net/wiki/core/TrackedResourceSet-2.0/index.html
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): TRS 3.0 draft link
points to a broken spec
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): TRS 2.0 spec is not
linked to
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): redirects were broken
for quite a while
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): we should consider
always linking to the last reviewed spec in addition to the current WD
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): we wanted to discourage
people from browsing the archive
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): Jim suggests not to
link to the Query 3.0
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): *2.0
Nick Crossley
(IBM): To avoid large numbers
of broken links and bookmarks, I believe open-services.net/wiki should
redirect to archive.open-services.net/wiki
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): one way is to grey
out the outdated specs with the red warning
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): another way is only
to link to the new versions and in the spec link back
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): https://github.com/OSLC/oslc-site-hugo/blob/master/content/specifications/_index.md
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): There is a number of
IBM employees that regularly check the old wikis. Redirects should work
properly.
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): Jad: If the old pages
are used frequently, we should lift them up to the new website.
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): Jim: we need to check
if the RDF files have diverged from the ones approved by the committee.
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): Link to the RDF files:
https://github.com/OSLC/oslc-site-hugo/tree/master/content/ns
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): https://github.com/oasis-tcs/oslc-domains/tree/master/open-services-vocabs
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): RDF files should be
scripted from hugo
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): There are two scripts
for that: one in the reSpec fork and the XSLT transform script.
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): the list is missing
tools
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): Links will need to
be updated after the OP migration
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): OP migration will also
break the links in the spec
--
Jim Amsden, Senior
Technical Staff Member
ELM Quality Manager
919-525-6575
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]