RE: [OSLC Domains] Actions on the TC reviews

The main issue with the RM specs (relating to section “2.4 resource formats “) is now resolved, as we discussed in the telco.

Only some minor issues remain as indicated in the updated Word document.

regards

______________________________

Jad El-khoury, PhD

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Mechatronics Division

Brinellvägen 83, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

Phone: +46(0)8 790 6877 Mobile: +46(0)70 773 93 45

From: Jad El-Khoury
Sent: 04 April 2018 00:46
To: oslc-domains@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [OSLC Domains] Actions on the TC reviews

Dear all,

I have now made the suggested changes to the RM specs, raised from the latest discussion on “Reified relationships in RM domain”.

I order to finalize the review comments I received from Martin & Mark, I would love to get your input on some of the remaining issues.

Martin, Mark, Jim & Nick!

It is also attached for your convenience.

I have tagged each row where I need your input with your name.

Please feel free to simply add your respond in that same column “action left” and I can take it from there.

Otherwise, the only remaining issue that we are awaiting a decision from the Core TC relates to “resource formats” (rdf/xml, turtle).