oslc-domains message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Combined Core and Domains TC Meeting Minutes 200190502
- From: "Jim Amsden" <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
- To: oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org, oslc-domains@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 11:06:41 -0400
David Honey (Persistent/IBM):Jim is on his way...
Jim Amsden
(IBM): https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oslc-core/201904/msg00008.html
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): David is
scribe
Jim Amsden
(IBM): Agenda:
Jim Amsden
(IBM): Open Project
* Dibbe has approve OSCT proposal
* Dibbe signed Entity CLA
* Nick, David, and Jim have signed
Individual CLA
* No known open issues
* Ballots should be submitted soon
* Target announcement May 8
* Reorganization of content
ReSpec
TRS
Config Management
Query
QM
Jim Amsden
(IBM): https://www.oasis-open.org/resources/projects/cla/projects-view-individual-cla
Jim Amsden
(IBM): https://www.oasis-open.org/resources/projects/cla/projects-view-individual-cla
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Gray needs
to get approval from his manager then sign the individual CLA.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): https://www.oasis-open.org/resources/projects/cla/projects-view-entity-cla
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Launch date
is 8th May.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Previous
discussion: Use same repo for core and domains, but separate repo for tools.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Plan is
to only move OPEN issues. Closed ones will remain in existing JIRA.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Andrew -
fine with moving and merging Domains Wiki/specs to same new repo as Core.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): but with
issues, we ought to shed any domains issues that are closed or no longer
relevant.
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): https://github.com/oasis-tcs/oslc-core/wiki/!TC-work
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-53?jql=project%20%3D%20OSLCCORE%20AND%20issuetype%20in%20standardIssueTypes()%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20New)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC%2C%20updated%20DESC
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Jim: Volunteers
to migrate issues. Should replicate labels to keep tagging of issues.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): There is
still the issue that migration is limited by number of API calls before
hitting limit that required waiting for 1 hour.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Existing
issues on Guthub Core will remain, that Github moves to new organization.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): s/Guthub/Github/
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Might be
some reorg, such as keep the core specs under a separate Core folder.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Jim: Will
propose new folder org.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Jim: Quality
Management will be first spec. Will nee Respec changes for that.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Nick hopes
to get Respec changes done by end of May.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Respec will
be moved from Nick's personal Github to OASIS one.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Nick would
prefer shape checker and Respec to be in same repo.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Has been
no merging of Respec with Steve Speicher's version or W3C.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Jim: Long
term goal, have OASIS take ownership of Respec so it can be used across
other OASIS open projects.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Nick: flatten
OASIS and W3C to single source, separate out OSLC-specific parts.
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): We are... 2500 commits
behind
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): https://github.com/ndjc/respec
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): https://github.com/w3c/respec
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH):
Andrew Berezovskyi
(KTH): I love this part in
https://github.com/w3c/respec#getting-started:"You don't need to check-out or fork this repository."
Gray Bachelor:Gray has gained internal approval and submitted a CLA
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): First open
project meeting - first after ballots announced.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Should dissolve
members for current OASIS TC.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Focus areas:
1) Domains specs nearing publication,
e.g. Quality Management
2) Draft specs for TRS, Config Management,
Query
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Andrew:
Wants to review domains issues.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Jim: Would
prefer focus on deliverables - many specs are years after original goals
for publication.
David Honey
(Persistent/IBM): Work on
issues should be those that block making progress on deliverables, such
as TRS spec.
List of attendees:
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH), David Honey (Persistent/IBM), Gray Bachelor,
Jad El-khoury (KTH), Jad El-khoury (KTH)1, Jim Amsden (IBM), Nick Crossley
(IBM)
Gray Bachelor:Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH)
David Honey (Persistent/IBM)
Gray Bachelor
Jad El-khoury (KTH)
Jim Amsden (IBM)
Gray Bachelor:Nick
Jim Amsden, Senior
Technical Staff Member
OSLC and Linked Lifecycle
Data
919-525-6575
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]