Further to yesterday discussion on terminology

[Antonio kung <antonio.kung@trialog.com>]

Dear all

Further to yesterday discussion, I explored an approach where we do not use the CMU-SEI terminology but retain the concept of quality.
I also took into account Dawn's comments.

Cheers

Antonio

Le 21/08/2013 23:39, Dawn Jutla a écrit :

Hi Gershon and all:

A few corrections to the minutes. I mentioned that privacy traditionally has been thought of as non functional. But so far the UML work that I presented to the TC for consideration has been treating privacy requirements as functional. The quality attributes form the different perspective (not the functional view).

Further, I raised several questions that I would like to see included in the minutes so that TC members can think on them and we can reason through them as a group as we consider the terminology issue: 

(1) Why would data collection and retention limit etc. be treated as functional requirements whereas the tactics for privacy are treated as quality attributes?  

(2) Should data minimization be separated from data protection in the taxonomy if we did adopt a quality attributes route? 

(3) Can we add functional privacy requirements to the privacy by design use case template so that embedding "privacy" becomes explicit to software engineers without their having to find subject matter experts in privacy (addition - as is happening now or not :)

Many thanks,

Dawn.

______________________________________
Dr. Dawn Jutla, PhD

Professor of Business and Computer Science

Department of Finance, Information Systems, and Mgmt. Science
SOBEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Saint Mary's University, Halifax, NS, B3H 3C3
Phone: 1 902 491 6441

Sobey School Bio: http://www.smu.ca/academic/sobey/bios/faculty/Jutla_Dawn.html
Website: http://husky1.stmarys.ca/~djutla/

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain confidential information that is protected by law and is for the sole use of the individuals or entities to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this email and destroying all copies of the communication and attachments. Further use, disclosure, copying, distribution of, or reliance upon the contents of this email and attachments is strictly prohibited.

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Gershon Janssen <gershon@qroot.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I have uploaded the 21 August PbD-SE TC meeting minutes to Kavi and are available at: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=50392&wg_abbrev=pbd-se

All comments are welcome.

Kind regards,

Gershon Janssen

-- 
_________________________________________________________________________

TRIALOG
25 rue du general Foy
F-75008 Paris
http://www.trialog.com

Tel   : 33 (0) 1 44 70 61 00  Direct : 33 (0) 1 44 70 61 03
Fax   : 33 (0) 1 44 70 05 91
mailto:antonio.kung@trialog.com
_________________________________________________________________________
    -- Software Engineering Focused on Embedded Systems Technology --
            -- Connectivity Solutions for Embedded Systems --
_____________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this transmission, which may be
confidential and proprietary, is only for the intended recipients.
Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. If you receive this
transmission in error, please notify me immediately by telephone
or electronic mail and confirm that you deleted this transmission
and the reply from your electronic mail system. 
_____________________________________________________________________

Attachment: Privacy by design terminology possible approach.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document