CKM_PKCS5_PBKD2_PARAMS - straw poll options

[Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>]

I'm not sure I have these correct.  The first two I'm pretty sure of, 
the last two/three not so much.


1) Do almost nothing.  Do not change the struct in either the text or 
header.  Annotate the mechanism description to point out the possible issue.

2) Deprecate the bug.  Do not change the current struct in either the 
text or the header.  Annotate the existing mechanism describing the 
current issue.  Deprecate the existing mechanism.  Deprecate the 
existing struct.  Create a new mechanism and new struct (with new names) 
that changes the type of ulPasswordLen from CK_ULONG_PTR to CK_ULONG.

3) Fix the declaration.  Update the existing struct changing 
CK_ULONG_PTR to CK_ULONG.  Change the header file to match.  Update any 
text and descriptions to match.  Annotate the change in the text.

4) Fix the textual convention.  Update the existing struct changing the 
name of ulPasswordLen to pulPasswordLen to agree with CK_ULONG_PTR as 
the type.  Update any text and descriptions to match.  Annotate the 
change in the text.

5) Something else?  I heard something like deprecate the struct without 
deprecating the mechanism and vice versa, but given that the mechanism 
type defines the type of the param field in the mechanism struct I'm not 
sure how that would work.

I'll reserve further comments on this entire topic until we have the 
appropriate set of choices.  I would suggest that whoever 
supports/proposes one of the choices MUST be the stuckee for providing 
appropriate edited text as I've already done for (2).

I think this is now in Valerie's hand to manage the formation of the 
straw poll.