Re: [pkcs11] CK_ULONG considered harmful?

[Tim Hudson <tjh@cryptsoft.com>]

On 21/05/2013 7:54 AM, Valerie Anne Fenwick wrote:
> I agree with this, and what Darren brought up earlier: in 3.0, let's
> use explicit types from the get-go and save these heartaches later
> on down the line.

And we also need to provide a mechanism for determining the type of an
attribute (especially required for user-defined attributes) so you know
the difference between a 4-byte array and a uint32 when dealing with
them generically. Again I think that is a 3.x item - not a 2.x item in
my view.

Tim.