Re: [pkcs11] Define CKA_JAVA_MIDP_SECURITY_DOMAIN constants

[Stef Walter <stefw@redhat.com>]

On 11.05.2013 00:32, Michael StJohns wrote:
> On 5/10/2013 8:31 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
>> As discussed earlier on the mailing list, following are the set of
>> modifications to the specification to be made in order to add constants
>> for CKA_JAVA_MIDP_SECURITY_DOMAIN.
>>
>> To be honest I'm not aware of what this is used for and am including
>> this proposal for completeness (of defining attribute constants) rather
>> than known utility.
>>
>> Since providing a clear diff of a docx file is challenging, I hope that
>> the following format indicating which paragraphs should be
>> added/replaced in which sections is sufficiently clear.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>> 6.4 Object types
>>
>> *** new item to be added
>> |   o CK_JAVA_MIDP_SECURITY_DOMAIN
>> |
>> |   CK_JAVA_MIDP_SECURITY_DOMAIN is a value that identifies the Java
>> |   MIDP security domain. It is defined as follows:
>> |
>> |       typedef CK_ULONG CK_JAVA_MIDP_SECURITY_DOMAIN;
>> |
>> |   For this version of Cryptoki, the following certificate categories
>> |   are defined:
>> |
>> |        CKV_DOMAIN_UNSPECIFIED
>> |        CKV_DOMAIN_MANUFACTURER
>> |        CKV_DOMAIN_OPERATOR
>> |        CKV_DOMAIN_THIRD_PARTY
> 
> Same comment as previous set of new values - suggest supplying at least
> a sentence for each of these to describing to what they apply.

Done, and sent new proposal to list.

Cheers,

Stef